Line integral where a vector field is given in cylindrical coordinates

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around evaluating a line integral of a vector field given in cylindrical coordinates, specifically along a half-circle path. The original poster describes their attempts to parameterize the curve and transform the vector field appropriately for integration.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the parameterization of the curve and the transformation of the vector field from cylindrical to Cartesian coordinates. There are questions about the correct limits for the parameterization and whether to remain in cylindrical coordinates.

Discussion Status

There is ongoing exploration of the parameterization and transformation process. Some participants express uncertainty about the parameterization limits and the necessity of converting coordinate systems. A few corrections and clarifications have been made regarding the setup of the integral.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of transforming a vector field and parameterizing a curve in cylindrical coordinates. There is acknowledgment of potential mistakes in the parameterization and the implications for the integral's evaluation.

goohu
Messages
53
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
see image
Relevant Equations
equation of circles; radius = x^2 + y^2
What I've done so far:

From the problem we know that the curve c is a half-circle with radius 1 with its center at (x,y) = (0, 1).

We can rewrite x = r cos t and y = 1 + r sin t, where r = 1 and 0<t<pi. z stays the same, so z=z.

We can then write l(t) = [x(t), y(t), z ] and solve for dl/dt.

The integral can be rewritten as integral A dot l(t) dt, with the limits as 0 and pi.Now everything would be fine if the vector field A was given in cartesian coordinates but its not. You could transform different coordinate systems but I can't figure it out. Could someone please show me how to start on the last steps?

I know how to transform specific coordinates but I'm having trouble transforming a whole function. If we can express A in cartesian form then we can use scalar multiplication in the last step to solve the problem.
 

Attachments

  • 20200417-112428_p0 (1).jpg
    20200417-112428_p0 (1).jpg
    25.4 KB · Views: 378
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
goohu said:
We can rewrite x = r cos t and y = r sin t, where r = 1 and 0<t<pi.
No, that does not put the centre of the arc at (0,1,0). Did you mean y=1+ r sin(t)?
 
yes, my bad.
 
I made a mistake during the parameterization.
t should be : ## -\pi / 2 < t < \pi / 2 ##

So the limits should be ## \int_\frac{-\pi}{2}^\frac{\pi}{2} A(t) ⋅ l(t) \ dt##
 
EDIT: scratch my last post. Maybe should stay in cylindrical. Still don't see why parametrize.
 
Last edited:
I have my doubts about this one but I got zero for an answer.
EDIT: I think I at least have the right procedure even if I'm capable of math errors: $$ \int \mathbf A \cdot d\mathbf l = \frac { (8z + 2)} {3} $$.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K