MHB Linear combination of sine and cosine function

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the minimum values of the function \(6\sin x + 8\cos x + 5\) and its subsequent transformations. The minimum of the original function is identified as \(-5\), leading to the minimum values of the derived functions: \((6\sin x + 8\cos x)^2 + 5\) is \(5\), \((6\sin x + 8\cos x)^3 + 5\) is \(-995\), and \((6\sin x + 8\cos x)^4 + 5\) is again \(5\). The discussion highlights the importance of correctly applying trigonometric identities to simplify the problem. Overall, the thread emphasizes the necessity of careful reasoning in mathematical problem-solving.
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Hi MHB! I recently came across a problem and I was thinking most likely I was missing something very obvious because I couldn't make sense of what was being asked, and I so wish to know what exactly that I failed to relate.

Question:
Find the minimum of $6\sin x+8\cos x+5$. Hence, find the minimum of $(6\sin x+8\cos x)^2+5,\,(6\sin x+8\cos x)^3+5$ and $(6\sin x+8\cos x)^4+5$.

It is important to stress that students are expected to solve it via trigonometry route but not other methods.

I would feel the "hence" implies that the first part of the question greatly help to reach to the answers for the subsequent parts of the problem, but not that I could see it...therefore, any insight would be helpful and thanks in advanced for the help!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
If f(x) has minimum m at x= x0 then f(x)+ 5 has minimum m+ 5 at x0, f(x)^2+ 5 has minimum m^2+ 5 at x= x0, and, generally, f(x)^n+ 5 has minimum m^n+ 5 at x= x-x0.
 
Country Boy said:
If f(x) has minimum m at x= x0 then[/color] f(x)+ 5 has minimum m+ 5 at x0, f(x)^2+ 5 has minimum m^2+ 5 at x= x0[/color], and, generally, f(x)^n+ 5 has minimum m^n+ 5 at x= x-x0.
That is not true. For example, the function $f(x) = \sin x$ has minimum $m = -1$ at $x_0 = \frac{3\pi}2$. But $f(x)^2 + 5$ does not have minimum $m^2+5 = 6$ at $x = x_0$. Instead, it has minimum $5$ at $x = 0$.
 
Argh!(Headbang) I couldn't believe how I overlooked something so trivially simple in order to deduce the minimum of the other functions! Once we rewrite $6\sin x+8\cos x+5=10\sin \left(x+\tan^{-1}\dfrac{4}{3}\right)+5$, we know the minimum can be attained at $-5$, and so the minimum values of

$(6\sin x+8\cos x)^2+5=\left(10\sin \left(x+\tan^{-1}\dfrac{4}{3}\right)\right)^2+5$ is $0+5=5$,

$(6\sin x+8\cos x)^3+5=\left(10\sin \left(x+\tan^{-1}\dfrac{4}{3}\right)\right)^3+5$ is $(-10)^3+5=-995$,

$(6\sin x+8\cos x)^4+5=\left(10\sin \left(x+\tan^{-1}\dfrac{4}{3}\right)\right)^4+5$ is $0+5=5$.

Sorry for asking something so simple!
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top