Linear equation, point slope conversion

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around converting a linear equation from point-slope form to a different format, specifically from Y − 200 = −4 (X − 15) to X = −0.25 ⋅ Y + 65. Participants are exploring the relationships between the forms of linear equations and the implications of slope and intercepts.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss their understanding of point-slope and slope-intercept forms, questioning the origin of the y-intercept in the conversion. Some express confusion about the relevance of the slope given as Δy/Δx = -36/4 and its connection to the problem. Others suggest focusing on the algebraic operations involved rather than a step-by-step conversion process.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants providing insights and corrections. Some have offered guidance on how to approach the conversion, while others are clarifying misunderstandings about slopes and intercepts. There is a recognition of the need to simplify expressions and the importance of accurately representing slopes in the context of the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem is derived from an example, and there are discussions about the accuracy of the slope values mentioned. There is also mention of potential confusion arising from the inclusion of additional information that may not directly pertain to the conversion task.

amerikantech
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


convert:
Y − 200 = −4 (X − 15)
to
X = −0.25 ⋅ Y + 65.

with a given Δy/Δx = -36/4

Homework Equations


point slope, slope intercept

The Attempt at a Solution


I understand point slope, slope intercept, and standard form, I understand how to convert one to the other, but I do not understand this conversion. I understand that .25 is the reciprocal of 4, but where does the 65 come from on the bottom equation for the y intercept? I found that if you convert the top equation to slope intercept form (y= -4x+260) and plug 0 into y then x will equal 65.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok, let me try to help you.
amerikantech said:
I understand that .25 is the reciprocal of 4
Just think of this as 1/4, no need to complicate it.
amerikantech said:
I understand point slope, slope intercept, and standard form, I understand how to convert one to the other, but I do not understand this conversion.
Don't think of the conversion as a set step of moves you need to execute to convert. You are trying to reach a goal. In this case, you are trying to move an equation of form ##y-a=m(x-b)## to an equation with one variable on one side and everything else on the other side.

Think about what algebra will be involved in the question, don't think about conversions. What operations? What techniques?

Write down each step carefully and think about what you are doing each step of the way.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: amerikantech and scottdave
Hi tech, :welcome:

You rewrote to y = f(x) but the exercise wants x = g(y), so bring -4x to the left (add 4x on both sides), and y and the constants to the right .

amerikantech said:
with a given Δy/Δx = -36/4
what do those words have to do with the exercise ?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: amerikantech
What do you get if you solve for x in terms of y?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: amerikantech
amerikantech said:
...with a given Δy/Δx = -36/4

The Attempt at a Solution


...but where does the 65 come from on the bottom equation for the y intercept? I found that if you convert the top equation to slope intercept form (y= -4x+260) and plug 0 into y then x will equal 65.
I don't think the Δy/Δx = -36/4 belongs with this problem. The equation is for a straight line, therefore has a constant slope (Δy/Δx), and it is not equal to -36/4.

As far as the 65. When you have an equation y = some function, the constant portion of that function will be the y-intercept.

So if you have x = some function, the constant portion of that function will be the x-intercept.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: amerikantech
lekh2003 said:
Ok, let me try to help you.

Just think of this as 1/4, no need to complicate it.

Don't think of the conversion as a set step of moves you need to execute to convert. You are trying to reach a goal. In this case, you are trying to move an equation of form ##y-a=m(x-b)## to an equation with one variable on one side and everything else on the other side.

Think about what algebra will be involved in the question, don't think about conversions. What operations? What techniques?

Write down each step carefully and think about what you are doing each step of the way.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

You are right, this problem I thought about too much I found out 4x/4 = 1/4 * y + 260/4, thank you
 
amerikantech said:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

You are right, this problem I thought about too much I found out 4x/4 = 1/4 * y + 260/4, thank you
I think you’re missing a minus sign.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: amerikantech
correction the slope was -36/9 and I justed added the slope for extra information. I meant to put the coordinate (15,200) for added information as well.

Thank you all for the replys, I found that I was thinking about the problem a little too much. This problem came from a given example that I was trying to understand.

what the problem was doing: Y − 200 = −4(X − 15) => 4x/4 = -1/4 * y + 260/4 => X = −0.25 * Y + 65
 
Chestermiller said:
I think you’re missing a minus sign.
yes, thank you, I do that way too often
 
  • #10
amerikantech said:
with a given Δy/Δx = -36/4

amerikantech said:
correction the slope was -36/9
Why are you writing these numbers in these unsimplified forms? -36/4 = -9 (which has nothing to do with this problem), and -36/9 = -4. You're making things harder for yourself by not simplying fractions.
 
  • #11
Mark44 said:
Why are you writing these numbers in these unsimplified forms? -36/4 = -9 (which has nothing to do with this problem), and -36/9 = -4. You're making things harder for yourself by not simplying fractions.
It was just added info to explain where my slope came from in case someone asked, so I just threw whatever I had out there. I initially made the error puting the simplified form in the denominatior and thought I had acknowledged that, sorry. Next time I will only include what I am after.
 
  • #12
So how did you get from a slope of -9 to y = -4x plus something? That equation is saying slope of -4, not -9. Did you mean to say -36/9 perhaps?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: amerikantech
  • #13
scottdave said:
So how did you get from a slope of -9 to y = -4x plus something? That equation is saying slope of -4, not -9. Did you mean to say -36/9 perhaps?
yes, I initially made the error puting the simplified form in the denominatior. -36/9 was supposed to be the original slope
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K