Linear Fractional Transformation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the linear fractional transformation defined by T(z) = (az + b) / (cz + d), where a, b, c, and d are real numbers satisfying ad - bc = 1. Participants analyze how this transformation maps the positive imaginary axis to either a vertical line at x = b/d, x = a/c, or a semicircle centered on the x-axis. Key insights include using parametric forms to derive the mappings and leveraging geometric properties of the transformation to establish the semicircle case.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear fractional transformations
  • Familiarity with complex analysis and the upper half-plane model
  • Knowledge of parametric equations and their geometric interpretations
  • Basic concepts of group theory, specifically SL2(R)
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the properties of SL2(R) and its role in transformations
  • Study the geometric interpretation of linear fractional transformations
  • Learn about the mapping of circles and lines in complex analysis
  • Investigate the implications of angle-preserving transformations in geometry
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of complex analysis, and anyone interested in the geometric properties of transformations in the upper half-plane model.

Kreizhn
Messages
714
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Let \mathbb{H}^2 = \{z=x+iy\in \mathbb{C} | y>0 \}. For a,b,c,d\in \mathbb{R} satisfying ad-bc=1 define T: \mathbb{H}^2 \rightarrow \mathbb{H}^2 by
T(z) = \frac{az+b}{cz+d}

Show that T maps that positive y-axis (imaginary axis) to the vertical line x=\frac{b}{d}, x= \frac{a}{c} or a semicircle centred on the x-axis containing both (\frac{b}{d},0) \text{ and } (\frac{a}{c},0)


The Attempt at a Solution



This seems like it should be fairly easy, but the answer has been eluding me. I began by proceeding as we would in finding the isotropy group, by taking the linear fractional map as a change of variables. Doing this we can set iy = \frac{aiy+b}{ciy+d} and conclude that in general a=d \text{ and } b=-cy^2. Then using ad-bc=1 we get that a^2+c^2y^2=1.

I'm wondering if we need to use anything special about the fact that we can express this mapping as
\begin{pmatrix} a&b\\ c&d \end{pmatrix} \in SL_2(\mathbb{R})

I can't quite seem to figure out where to go from there...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are kind of off on the wrong track. Put z=i*t, t>=0. Then set Re(T(it))=x(t) and Im(T(it))=y(t). Now you have a parametric form of the curve (x(t),y(t)). It should be pretty clear that x=b/d corresponds to the c=0 case and x=a/c corresponds to the d=0 case. For the semicircle case you should be able to do brute force and show (x(t),y(t)) satisfies the equation of the given circle. I'm not sure if there is a cleverer way, but you can at least note (x(0),y(0))=(b/d,0) and limit t->infinity of (x(t),y(t))=(a/c,0).
 
Yes, I've looked at the parametric solutions and b/d and a/c are fairly clear. But the semi-circle case isn't entirely clear. Though I'm not too worried about it at this point. I'll just hand wave it.
 
Kreizhn said:
For a,b,c,d\in \mathbb{R} satisfying ad-bc=1 define T: \mathbb{H}^2 \rightarrow \mathbb{H}^2 by
T(z) = \frac{az+b}{cz+d}

Show that T maps that positive y-axis (imaginary axis) to the vertical line x=\frac{b}{d}, x= \frac{a}{c} or a semicircle centred on the x-axis containing both (\frac{b}{d},0) \text{ and } (\frac{a}{c},0)

How about using complex conjugates:

(T(iy) - (q,0))^2 = (\frac{aiy\,+\,b}{ciy\,+\,d}\,-\,q)^2

=\,\frac{(aiy\,+\,b)\,-\,q(ciy\,+\,d)}{ciy\,+\,d}\,\frac{(-aiy\,+\,b)\,-\,q(-ciy\,+\,d)}{-ciy\,+\,d}

= … :smile:
 
Kreizhn said:
Yes, I've looked at the parametric solutions and b/d and a/c are fairly clear. But the semi-circle case isn't entirely clear. Though I'm not too worried about it at this point. I'll just hand wave it.

Here's an argument assuming you know these transformations map lines and circles to lines and circles AND are angle preserving. T maps the x-axis to the x-axis. For T(t)=(x(t),y(t)), T(0)=(b/d,0), T(infinity)=(a/c,0). So T(t) is a curve passing through T(0) and T(infinity). But since the y-axis is orthogonal to the x-axis, the curve T(t) is also orthogonal to the x-axis at T(0). That's enough geometric facts to force it to be the circle you described.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K