Linear Independence: Proving Dependency of {v1,v2,v3,v4}

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that if the set of vectors {v1, v2, v3} in R^(m) is linearly dependent, then the addition of any vector v4 from R^(m) maintains the linear dependence of the set {v1, v2, v3, v4}. Participants confirm that the presence of a non-trivial solution for {v1, v2, v3} guarantees that any vector v4 will not alter this dependency. The reasoning provided is sound and aligns with the definitions of linear dependence and independence.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear independence and dependence
  • Familiarity with vector spaces in R^(m)
  • Knowledge of trivial and non-trivial solutions in linear algebra
  • Basic proficiency in mathematical proof techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of linear dependence in vector spaces
  • Learn about the concept of spanning sets in R^(m)
  • Explore the role of bases in linear algebra
  • Investigate methods for proving linear independence using determinants
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in linear algebra, mathematicians focusing on vector spaces, and anyone interested in understanding the properties of linear combinations and dependencies among vectors.

EV33
Messages
192
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


If the set {v1,v2,v3} of vectors in R^(m) is linearly dependent, then argue that the set {v1,v2,v3,v4} is also linearly dependent for every choice of v4 in R^(m).


Homework Equations


Definitions would be more relevant so...

Linearly Independent: If the only solution is the trivial solution

Linearly Dependent: If there are more solutions than he trivial solution.

The Attempt at a Solution



I started out by writing out three vectors that are a dependent set, and I noticed that no matter what I added for v4 there would still be that non trivial solution, therefore making it remain dependent.

Is that sound reasoning?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi EV33! :smile:

(try using the X2 and X2 tags just above the Reply box :wink:)
EV33 said:
I started out by writing out three vectors that are a dependent set, and I noticed that no matter what I added for v4 there would still be that non trivial solution, therefore making it remain dependent.

Is that sound reasoning?

If I'm guessing correctly what you mean, then yes that's sound.

But you should write it properly, starting "if v1 v2 and v3 are dependent, then there exist …" :wink:
 
Thank you very much
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K