Linear Interpolation for Given Function

  • Thread starter Thread starter ForTheGreater
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Linear
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the linear interpolant for a given function with specified values at certain points. The initial attempt using Lagrange basis functions was unsuccessful, leading to confusion about the problem's requirements. The correct approach involves finding the equations of the straight lines connecting the points, specifically for the interval from -pi to -pi/2. The book provides the answer for the first interpolant as the equation of the line through the points (-pi, 4) and (-pi/2, 5/4). Ultimately, the task is to provide the interpolant for all specified intervals.
ForTheGreater
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Decide the linear interpolant

f(-pi)=4 f(-pi/2)=5/4 f(0)=1 f(pi/2)=-3/4 f(pi)=0

the function is (1/pi2 ) (x-pi)2 - cos2 (x-pi/2)

Don't know how to do this. I tried lagrange basis functions f(x0)(x1-x)/(x1-x0)+f(x1)(x-x0)/(x1-x0)

But it doesn't turn out right.

The answer for the first interpolant (interval -pi to -pi/2) is: 4-11(x+pi)/(2pi)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I sense a contradiction between the problem statement "Decide the interpolant" and the book answer "The answer for the first interpolant ... is...".
Could it be that all you are asked to provide is the four equations "connecting the dots" ?

(The book answer for the first section is the equation of the straight line through ##(-\pi, 4)## and ##(-\pi/2, 5/4)##. )

--
 
I have the answer here, it wasn't in the problem.

I'm suppose to give the interpolant in all intervals, or as you put it connect the dots.

Thank you!
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top