Linear Programming - satisfaction only at least one constraint

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around modifying a linear programming (LP) problem to allow for feasibility if at least one of multiple constraints is satisfied, rather than all. The original poster seeks a way to treat any combination of satisfied inequalities as feasible, contrasting with traditional LP requirements. Suggestions include solving separate LP problems for each constraint and selecting the optimal solution among them. The concept of "tight" constraints is also mentioned, emphasizing the importance of identifying which constraints can be relaxed. Overall, the focus is on exploring alternatives to standard LP feasibility criteria.
wavingerwin
Messages
93
Reaction score
0
Linear Programming - satisfaction of only at least one constraint

Hi

Is there a form of relaxation/modification of an LP of the form
\text{min }\;\;f^\mathsf{T}x\\\mathbf{A}x\leq b
such that if only anyone of the constraints is satisfied, then the solution ##x## is regarded as feasible?

Here ##\mathbf{A}x\leq b## represents a row of linear constraints.

Gratitudes in advance.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't really understand what you mean. If we have a constraint with only one inequality instead of a system of more than one, then we have a new LP-problem.
 
Erland said:
If we have a constraint with only one inequality instead of a system of more than one, then we have a new LP-problem.

The LP I am concerned with has a number of inequalities. However, I need to only have at least one of them satisfied. This can be any combination of the inequalities, not a particular one.

Say the LP has 5 inequalities to satisfy. I want to have that satisfying at least one of the 5 means that the solution is feasible, as opposed to having all of the 5 satisfied, like in a standard LP. However, it can be any combination of the constraint, for example [1 0 0 0 0], [0 0 1 1 0], and many others, where 1 and 0 correspond to each of the inequality being satisfied or unsatisfied respectively.
 
I see... If there are n inequalities, you could solve n LP problems, one for each inequality, and choose the one with smallest value.
 
There is the concept of whether a constraint is "tight" at an optimal solution. If you find an optimal solution subject to n inequality constraints then to improvie on that solution, look at dropping the constraits that are satisified as exact equalities.
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K