Linearisation of continuity equation (cosmology)

ergospherical
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Education Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,097
Reaction score
1,384
Homework Statement
Show linearisation of
##\frac{\partial \rho}{\partial t} + 3H \rho + \frac{1}{a} \nabla \cdot (\rho \mathbf{v}) = 0##
is
##\frac{\partial \delta}{\partial t} + \frac{1}{a} \nabla \cdot (\delta \mathbf{v}) = 0##
where
##\delta \equiv \delta \rho / \bar{\rho}##, ##\rho = \bar{\rho} + \epsilon \delta \rho##, ##\mathbf{v} = \epsilon \delta \mathbf{v}##, and ##\epsilon \ll 1##.
Relevant Equations
N/A
After expanding to first order in ##\epsilon## and subtracting off the unperturbed equation, I get\begin{align*}
\frac{\partial \delta \rho}{\partial t} + 3H \delta \rho + \frac{\bar{\rho}}{a} \nabla \cdot \delta \mathbf{v}=0
\end{align*}I'm not sure how to deal with the ##3H \delta \rho## term. Where does ##H## enter? (##H = \dot{a}/a## is the Hubble parameter).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The 0'th order eqn is $$ \partial_t \bar\rho ~+~ 3 H \bar\rho ~=~ 0 ~.$$ You must use this in the 1st order eqn.

Additional hint: before writing out the 1st order eqn, compute ##\,\partial_t \left( \frac{\delta\rho}{\bar\rho} \right)## carefully, separately, using the 0'th order eqn.

[Question for other HW helpers: does the above give away too much of the solution in one go? I'm never really sure where the balance lies.]
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and ergospherical
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top