Linearity of Schrodinger Equation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on demonstrating the superposition principle of the Schrödinger equation, specifically how the linear combination of two solutions, Psi1(x,t) and Psi2(x,t), results in another valid solution, Psi(x,t) = Psi1(x,t) + Psi2(x,t). Participants clarify that to prove this, one must substitute Psi into the left side of the Schrödinger equation and show that it satisfies the equation. The key equation involved is -\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^2} \Psi(x,t) + V(x) \Psi(x,t) = i \hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial t} \Psi(x,t).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Schrödinger equation
  • Familiarity with quantum mechanics principles
  • Knowledge of linear algebra and superposition
  • Basic calculus, particularly partial derivatives
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Schrödinger equation in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the concept of linear operators in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the implications of superposition in quantum states
  • Investigate the role of potential energy V(x) in the Schrödinger equation
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on quantum mechanics, as well as educators looking to explain the superposition principle in the context of the Schrödinger equation.

dainylee
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Could someone please address this question?
How do you algebraically demonstrate the superposition principle revealed by the Schrödinger equation (ie. If Psi1(x,t) and Psi2(x,t) are both solutions then Psi(x,t)= Psi1(x,t)+Psi2(x,t) is also a solution.)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What do you get when you substitute Psi(x,t) into the left side of the Schrödinger equation?
 
I am not quite sure what you are asking me to do...Psi(x,t) is already in there?
 
No, \psi(x,t) is not in there. However, you do know that \psi_1(x,t) is a solution -

-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{d^2}{dx^2}\psi_1(x,t)+V(x)\psi_1(x,t)=i \hbar \frac{d}{dt}\psi_1(x,t)And \psi_2(x,t) is also in there:

-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{d^2}{dx^2}\psi_2(x,t)+V(x)\psi_2(x,t)=i \hbar \frac{d}{dt}\psi_2(x,t)However, you have to show that \psi=\psi_1+\psi_2 also satisfies this dynamic equation.

And then you can extend your result to a\psi_1 + b\psi_2 for any coefficents a,b.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
dainylee said:
I am not quite sure what you are asking me to do...Psi(x,t) is already in there?

You have to show that

<br /> -\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^2} \Psi(x,t) + V(x) \Psi(x,t) = i \hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial t} \Psi (x,t).<br />

In the left, substitute \Psi = \Psi_1 + \Psi_2, and, using that \Psi_1 and \Psi_2 both statisfy Schrödinger's equation, work your way to the right side of the equation you must show true.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K