Linearity of Schrodinger Equation

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around demonstrating the superposition principle in the context of the Schrödinger equation. Participants are exploring how to algebraically show that if two wave functions, Psi1(x,t) and Psi2(x,t), are solutions, then their sum, Psi(x,t) = Psi1(x,t) + Psi2(x,t), is also a solution. The focus is on the mathematical reasoning and steps involved in this demonstration.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asks how to algebraically demonstrate the superposition principle as revealed by the Schrödinger equation.
  • Another participant suggests substituting Psi(x,t) into the left side of the Schrödinger equation to explore the implications.
  • A participant expresses confusion about the request, indicating that Psi(x,t) is already present in the discussion.
  • Another participant clarifies that Psi(x,t) is not explicitly in the equation and emphasizes the need to show that Psi = Psi1 + Psi2 satisfies the dynamic equation.
  • Further, it is proposed to extend the result to a linear combination a*Psi1 + b*Psi2 for any coefficients a and b.
  • There is a reiteration of the need to substitute Psi = Psi1 + Psi2 into the equation and derive the necessary results based on the known solutions Psi1 and Psi2.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding regarding the steps needed to demonstrate the superposition principle. There is no consensus on the approach, and some participants seek clarification while others provide guidance.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of confusion regarding the substitution process and the specific requirements of the demonstration, which may depend on the participants' interpretations of the Schrödinger equation.

dainylee
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Could someone please address this question?
How do you algebraically demonstrate the superposition principle revealed by the Schrödinger equation (ie. If Psi1(x,t) and Psi2(x,t) are both solutions then Psi(x,t)= Psi1(x,t)+Psi2(x,t) is also a solution.)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What do you get when you substitute Psi(x,t) into the left side of the Schrödinger equation?
 
I am not quite sure what you are asking me to do...Psi(x,t) is already in there?
 
No, [tex]\psi(x,t)[/tex] is not in there. However, you do know that [tex]\psi_1(x,t)[/tex] is a solution -

[tex]-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{d^2}{dx^2}\psi_1(x,t)+V(x)\psi_1(x,t)=i \hbar \frac{d}{dt}\psi_1(x,t)[/tex]And [tex]\psi_2(x,t)[/tex] is also in there:

[tex]-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{d^2}{dx^2}\psi_2(x,t)+V(x)\psi_2(x,t)=i \hbar \frac{d}{dt}\psi_2(x,t)[/tex]However, you have to show that [tex]\psi=\psi_1+\psi_2[/tex] also satisfies this dynamic equation.

And then you can extend your result to [tex]a\psi_1 + b\psi_2[/tex] for any coefficents a,b.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
dainylee said:
I am not quite sure what you are asking me to do...Psi(x,t) is already in there?

You have to show that

[tex] -\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^2} \Psi(x,t) + V(x) \Psi(x,t) = i \hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial t} \Psi (x,t).[/tex]

In the left, substitute [itex]\Psi = \Psi_1 + \Psi_2[/itex], and, using that [itex]\Psi_1[/itex] and [itex]\Psi_2[/itex] both statisfy Schrödinger's equation, work your way to the right side of the equation you must show true.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K