Linearity of Schrodinger Equation

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 11K views
dainylee
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Could someone please address this question?
How do you algebraically demonstrate the superposition principle revealed by the Schrödinger equation (ie. If Psi1(x,t) and Psi2(x,t) are both solutions then Psi(x,t)= Psi1(x,t)+Psi2(x,t) is also a solution.)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I am not quite sure what you are asking me to do...Psi(x,t) is already in there?
 
No, [tex]\psi(x,t)[/tex] is not in there. However, you do know that [tex]\psi_1(x,t)[/tex] is a solution -

[tex]-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{d^2}{dx^2}\psi_1(x,t)+V(x)\psi_1(x,t)=i \hbar \frac{d}{dt}\psi_1(x,t)[/tex]And [tex]\psi_2(x,t)[/tex] is also in there:

[tex]-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{d^2}{dx^2}\psi_2(x,t)+V(x)\psi_2(x,t)=i \hbar \frac{d}{dt}\psi_2(x,t)[/tex]However, you have to show that [tex]\psi=\psi_1+\psi_2[/tex] also satisfies this dynamic equation.

And then you can extend your result to [tex]a\psi_1 + b\psi_2[/tex] for any coefficents a,b.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
dainylee said:
I am not quite sure what you are asking me to do...Psi(x,t) is already in there?

You have to show that

[tex] -\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^2} \Psi(x,t) + V(x) \Psi(x,t) = i \hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial t} \Psi (x,t).[/tex]

In the left, substitute [itex]\Psi = \Psi_1 + \Psi_2[/itex], and, using that [itex]\Psi_1[/itex] and [itex]\Psi_2[/itex] both statisfy Schrödinger's equation, work your way to the right side of the equation you must show true.