MHB Linearization of this equation / Inverse function

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the inverse function of the equation y = a * (exp(-b * x) + c * (1 - exp(-b * x))). Initially, the user struggled with online tools that failed to provide a workable inverse function. After some attempts, the correct inverse function was derived as f^{-1}(x) = (1/b) * ln((a(1-c))/(x-ac)). The user clarified that the constant 'a' also affects the equation, leading to different results in their calculations. Ultimately, the problem was solved, confirming the feasibility of deriving the inverse function.
guiismiti
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I need to find the inverse function of the following equation

Code:
y = a * ((exp(-b * x)) + (c * (1 - (exp(-b * x)))))

Where a, b and c are constants.

I have experimental points that fit to this equation and I want to use these values in the inverse funtion to linearize it.

I have tried to use a few tools available online, but the output functions did not work, which made me think if it is actually possible to do it.Can anybody help me?
Thanks in advance.

Edited: solved
Code:
x = (1 / (-b)) * (LN(((a * c) - y) / (a * (c - 1))))
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
We are given:

$$f(x)=ae^{-bx}+c\left(1-e^{-bx}\right)=(a-c)e^{-bx}+c$$

To find the inverse function, we can write:

$$x=(a-c)e^{-by}+c$$

Solve for $y$:

$$x-c=(a-c)e^{-by}$$

$$\frac{x-c}{a-c}=e^{-by}$$

$$\ln\left(\frac{x-c}{a-c}\right)=-by$$

$$y=\frac{1}{b}\ln\left(\frac{a-c}{x-c}\right)$$

Thus, we may claim:

$$f^{-1}(x)=\frac{1}{b}\ln\left(\frac{a-c}{x-c}\right)$$
 
MarkFL said:
We are given:

$$f(x)=ae^{-bx}+c\left(1-e^{-bx}\right)=(a-c)e^{-bx}+c$$

To find the inverse function, we can write:

$$x=(a-c)e^{-by}+c$$

Solve for $y$:

$$x-c=(a-c)e^{-by}$$

$$\frac{x-c}{a-c}=e^{-by}$$

$$\ln\left(\frac{x-c}{a-c}\right)=-by$$

$$y=\frac{1}{b}\ln\left(\frac{a-c}{x-c}\right)$$

Thus, we may claim:

$$f^{-1}(x)=\frac{1}{b}\ln\left(\frac{a-c}{x-c}\right)$$

The constant 'a' also multiplies the second term, that's why we got different results.

$$f(x)=ae^{-bx}+ac\left(1-e^{-bx}\right)$$
 
guiismiti said:
The constant 'a' also multiplies the second term, that's why we got different results.

$$f(x)=ae^{-bx}+ac\left(1-e^{-bx}\right)$$

So it does...I missed that...lemme try again:


We are given:

$$f(x)=a\left(e^{-bx}+c\left(1-e^{-bx}\right)\right)=a(1-c)e^{-bx}+ac$$

To find the inverse function, we can write:

$$x=a(1-c)e^{-by}+ac$$

Solve for $y$:

$$x-ac=a(1-c)e^{-by}$$

$$\frac{x-ac}{a(1-c)}=e^{-by}$$

$$\ln\left(\frac{x-ac}{a(1-c)}\right)=-by$$

$$y=\frac{1}{b}\ln\left(\frac{a(1-c)}{x-ac}\right)$$

Thus, we may claim:

$$f^{-1}(x)=\frac{1}{b}\ln\left(\frac{a(1-c)}{x-ac}\right)$$
 
MarkFL said:
So it does...I missed that...lemme try again

Done :)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Back
Top