Linearly Dependent Sets: Answers to Your Questions

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the concept of linear dependence in sets of vectors and matrices, exploring definitions, implications, and methods for determining linear dependence or independence. It includes theoretical inquiries and practical applications related to linear algebra.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether all linearly dependent sets have elements that are linear combinations of each other or if this is only true for some sets.
  • Another participant provides a definition of linear dependence and explains that if a set of vectors is linearly dependent, at least one vector can be expressed as a linear combination of the others, and vice versa.
  • A third participant expresses gratitude for the responses received and inquires about the responder's location.
  • A later reply suggests using invertibility as an alternative method for determining the linear independence of a set.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants appear to agree on the definition of linear dependence and its implications, but the initial question regarding the universality of linear combinations in all dependent sets remains open. The discussion on using invertibility as a method for determining linear independence introduces a new perspective that has not been fully explored.

Contextual Notes

The discussion does not resolve the initial question about the universality of linear combinations in linearly dependent sets, nor does it clarify the relationship between invertibility and linear independence in detail.

ichigo444
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Do all linearly dependent sets have elements that are linear combinations of each other? Or does this apply only to some of the Linearly Dependent sets?

And as a follow up question: How do you know if a set of 2x2 matrices is linearly dependent or linearly independent?

Thank you and may God bless you. :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The usual definition of "linearly dependent" is

"The vectors \{v_1, v_2, v_3,\cdot\cdot\cdot, v_n\} are linearly dependent if and only if there exist scalars a_1, a_2, a_3, \cdot\cdot\cdot, a_n, not all 0, such that a_1v_1+ a_2v_2+ a_3v_3+ \cdot\cdot\cdot+ a_nv_n= 0".

Suppose a_k is non-zero. Then we can write a_1v_1+ \cdot\cdot\cdot+ a_{k-1}v_{k-1}+ a_{k+1}v_{k+1}+ \cdot\cdot\cdot+ a_nv_n= -a_kv_k. Now, since a_k\ne 0, we can divide both sides of the equation by it to get v_k written as a linear combination of the other vectors in the set.

So, yes, if a set of vectors is linearly dependent, then at least one of them can be written as a linear combination of the others.

That works the other way, also- if at least one of the vectors can be written as a linear combination of the others, then they are linearly dependent. That can be used as an alternate definition of "linearly dependent".
 
Wow thank you good sir/ma'am. You have been answering all my question for what seems to be ages now. Thank you very much and may i know where you are from?
 
Sir may i add? May i use invertability as an alternative way of determining the linear independence of a set? Thank you again.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K