MHB Linearly independence using Wronskian?

Cadbury
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Hi, so I am given this problem:

Using the Wronskian, show that 1, x, x^2,..., x^(n-1) for n>1 are linearly independent.

The wronskian is not zero for at least one value in the interval so it is linearly independent, I just do not know how to show it properly.Thank you! :D
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Cadbury,

Linear independence of a set of functions $f_1(x),\ldots, f_n(x)$ means that for every $x$ (not just a particular $x$), $f_1(x),\ldots, f_n(x)$ is linearly independent. To show that $1,x,\ldots, x^{n-1}$ is linearly independent using the Wronskian, you must show that the Wronskian $W(1,x,\ldots, x^{n-1})$ is never zero. Prove that $W(1,x,\ldots, x^{n-1})$ is the determinant of an upper triangular $n\times n$ matrix whose $j$th diagonal entry is $(j-1)!$. Explain why this implies $W(1,x,\ldots, x^{n-1})$ is never zero.
 
Euge said:
Hi Cadbury,

Linear independence of a set of functions $f_1(x),\ldots, f_n(x)$ means that for every $x$ (not just a particular $x$), $f_1(x),\ldots, f_n(x)$ is linearly independent. To show that $1,x,\ldots, x^{n-1}$ is linearly independent using the Wronskian, you must show that the Wronskian $W(1,x,\ldots, x^{n-1})$ is never zero. Prove that $W(1,x,\ldots, x^{n-1})$ is the determinant of an upper triangular $n\times n$ matrix whose $j$th diagonal entry is $(j-1)!$. Explain why this implies $W(1,x,\ldots, x^{n-1})$ is never zero.
so, i can just show a matrix then find the determinant and then it is done? :) Thank you!
 
Well, either by computing the Wronskian (getting a value of $2! 3!\cdots (n-1)!$) or by noting that the Wronskian matrix is upper triangular with nonzero diagonal entries (hence invertible), you deduce that $W(1,x,\ldots x^{n-1}) \neq 0$ for all $x$, which shows that $1,x,\ldots, x^{n-1}$ is linearly independent.
 
I have the equation ##F^x=m\frac {d}{dt}(\gamma v^x)##, where ##\gamma## is the Lorentz factor, and ##x## is a superscript, not an exponent. In my textbook the solution is given as ##\frac {F^x}{m}t=\frac {v^x}{\sqrt {1-v^{x^2}/c^2}}##. What bothers me is, when I separate the variables I get ##\frac {F^x}{m}dt=d(\gamma v^x)##. Can I simply consider ##d(\gamma v^x)## the variable of integration without any further considerations? Can I simply make the substitution ##\gamma v^x = u## and then...

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K