MHB Lipschitz Condition and Uniform Continuity

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the Lipschitz condition and its implications for uniform continuity as presented in "Introduction to Real Analysis" (Fourth Edition) by Robert G. Bartle and Donald R. Sherbert, specifically in Example 5.4.6 (b). Participants confirm that there is no constant \( K > 0 \) such that \( |g(x)| \leq K |x| \) for all \( x \in I \), as demonstrated by the behavior of the function \( \sqrt{x} \) compared to \( x \) for values of \( x \) approaching zero. The conclusion is that the Lipschitz condition fails because \( K \) must increase indefinitely as \( x \) decreases towards zero.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lipschitz continuity and its mathematical definition
  • Familiarity with the concept of uniform continuity
  • Basic knowledge of real analysis, particularly functions and limits
  • Ability to manipulate inequalities involving functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the formal definition of Lipschitz functions in real analysis
  • Explore examples of functions that are Lipschitz continuous and those that are not
  • Learn about the implications of Lipschitz continuity on uniform continuity
  • Investigate the behavior of functions as they approach limits, particularly near zero
USEFUL FOR

Students of real analysis, mathematicians focusing on continuity concepts, and educators teaching advanced calculus or analysis courses.

Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading "Introduction to Real Analysis" (Fourth Edition) by Robert G Bartle and Donald R Sherbert ...

I am focused on Chapter 5: Continuous Functions ...

I need help in fully understanding an aspect of Example 5.4.6 (b) ...Example 5.4.6 (b) ... ... reads as follows:
View attachment 7285In the above text from Bartle and Sherbert we read the following:

"... ... However, there is no number $$K \gt 0$$ such that $$\lvert g(x) \lvert \le K \lvert x \lvert $$ for all $$x \in I$$. ... ... "Can someone please explain why the above quoted statement holds true ...

Peter*** EDIT 1 ***Just noticed that for $$x$$ less than $$1$$ we have $$\sqrt{x}$$ is larger than $$x$$ ... ...

e.g. $$\sqrt{0.0004}$$ is $$0.02$$ ... ... and then we require $$K$$ such that ...

$$\lvert 0.02 \lvert \le K \lvert 0.0004 \lvert$$

... so a large $$K$$ is required ... ... and the required number will get larger and larger without bound as $$x$$ gets smaller ...
Is the above the correct explanation for $$f$$ not being Lipschitz on $$I$$ ... ... ?Peter
*** EDIT 2 ***It may be helpful for readers of the above post to have access to B&S's definition of the Lipschitz function/condition ... ... so I am providing the following text from Bartle and Sherbert ...
View attachment 7286
Note that in the above example B&S take $$u $$ as the point $$u = 0$$ ... ... Peter
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Peter,

Your reasoning in Edit 1 is correct. Symbolically you could note that for $x\in (0,2]$, $x^{-1/2}\leq K$, verifying your claim that $K$ grows without bound as $x\rightarrow 0^{+}$.
 
As shown by this animation, the fibers of the Hopf fibration of the 3-sphere are circles (click on a point on the sphere to visualize the associated fiber). As far as I understand, they never intersect and their union is the 3-sphere itself. I'd be sure whether the circles in the animation are given by stereographic projection of the 3-sphere from a point, say the "equivalent" of the ##S^2## north-pole. Assuming the viewpoint of 3-sphere defined by its embedding in ##\mathbb C^2## as...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
3K