Lipschitz function and Baire Category Theorem

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on demonstrating the existence of a continuous function f: [0,1] to R that is not Lipschitz on the interval [r,s] for every 0 ≤ r < s ≤ 1, utilizing the Baire Category Theorem. The set A(r,s), defined as all continuous functions that are Lipschitz on [r,s], is shown to be closed but not dense. The key strategy involves finding a function g that is uniformly continuous but not Lipschitz, such as g = sqrt(x-r) on the specified interval, to construct a new function h = f + g that maintains continuity while failing the Lipschitz condition.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Baire Category Theorem
  • Knowledge of Lipschitz continuity
  • Familiarity with uniform continuity
  • Basic calculus, specifically derivatives and continuity
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the Baire Category Theorem in functional analysis
  • Explore examples of functions that are continuous but not Lipschitz, such as sqrt(x)
  • Investigate the properties of closed sets in the context of functional spaces
  • Learn about constructing functions that combine properties of continuity and Lipschitz conditions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students in real analysis, and anyone interested in advanced topics related to continuity and functional properties in mathematical analysis.

itzik26
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
hey,
I need to show, using Baire Category Theorem, that there exits a continuous function
f: [0,1] to R , that isn't Lipschitz on the interval [r,s] for every 0<=r<s<=1 .

I defined the set A(r,s) to be all the continuous functions that are lipschitz on the interval [r,s]. I showed that A(r,s) is closed , but I'm having trouble showing it's nowhere dense.

help please! :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
itzik26 said:
I defined the set A(r,s) to be all the continuous functions that are lipschitz on the interval [r,s]. I showed that A(r,s) is closed , but I'm having trouble showing it's nowhere dense.

So, you must show that A(r,s) has empty interior. So take an f in A(r,s). Try to find a g arbitrary close to f such that g\notin A(r,s). This will show that f is not in the interior of A(r,s).
Note that our g will always be uniform continuous (since it is continuous on a compact domain). So you must somehow use a function that is uniform continuous but not Lipschitz. Do you know such a function?
 
sqrt(x), for example, is continuous but not lipschitz on [0,1], but i don't know how to continue from here.
 
itzik26 said:
sqrt(x), for example, is continuous but not lipschitz on [0,1], but i don't know how to continue from here.

Do you see why it is not Lipschitz?? Can you do something similar on [r,s]??
And can you modify the function such that it is close to f?
 
it's not Lipschitz because it's first derivative isn't bounded close to 0.
o.k., so given f and a>0, define g as follows: g=sqrt[x-r] in the interval [r,a^2/4+r], g=0 for x<=r and g=a/2 for x>=a^2/4+r. g is not Lipschitz on [r,s]. define h=f+g.
h isn't Lipschitz because g isn't Lipschitz and d(f,h)<a.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K