Lipschitz function and Baire Category Theorem

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 5K views
itzik26
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
hey,
I need to show, using Baire Category Theorem, that there exits a continuous function
f: [0,1] to R , that isn't Lipschitz on the interval [r,s] for every 0<=r<s<=1 .

I defined the set A(r,s) to be all the continuous functions that are lipschitz on the interval [r,s]. I showed that A(r,s) is closed , but I'm having trouble showing it's nowhere dense.

help please! :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
itzik26 said:
I defined the set A(r,s) to be all the continuous functions that are lipschitz on the interval [r,s]. I showed that A(r,s) is closed , but I'm having trouble showing it's nowhere dense.

So, you must show that A(r,s) has empty interior. So take an f in A(r,s). Try to find a g arbitrary close to f such that [itex]g\notin A(r,s)[/itex]. This will show that f is not in the interior of A(r,s).
Note that our g will always be uniform continuous (since it is continuous on a compact domain). So you must somehow use a function that is uniform continuous but not Lipschitz. Do you know such a function?
 
sqrt(x), for example, is continuous but not lipschitz on [0,1], but i don't know how to continue from here.
 
it's not Lipschitz because it's first derivative isn't bounded close to 0.
o.k., so given f and a>0, define g as follows: g=sqrt[x-r] in the interval [r,a^2/4+r], g=0 for x<=r and g=a/2 for x>=a^2/4+r. g is not Lipschitz on [r,s]. define h=f+g.
h isn't Lipschitz because g isn't Lipschitz and d(f,h)<a.