MHB Log-sine and log-cosine integrals

  • Thread starter Thread starter polygamma
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integrals
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on proving specific integral identities involving logarithmic functions of sine and cosine over defined intervals. The integrals presented are: for \(0 \le \theta \le \pi\), \( \int_{0}^{\theta} \ln(\sin x) \ dx = - \theta \ln 2 - \frac{1}{2} \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{\sin (2n \theta)}{n^{2}}\), and for \(0 \le \theta \le \frac{\pi}{2}\), \( \int_{0}^{\theta} \ln(\cos x) \ dx = - \theta \ln 2 + \frac{1}{2} \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} (-1)^{n+1} \frac{\sin (2n \theta)}{n^{2}}\). Participants express interest in these results, with one suggesting a related problem involving logarithmic integrals with additional parameters. The conversation highlights the mathematical exploration of integrals and their properties. Overall, the thread emphasizes the significance of these logarithmic integral identities in mathematical analysis.
polygamma
Messages
227
Reaction score
0
For a few of you, this probably isn't very challenging. But I'm going to post it anyways since I find it interesting.
Show that for $0 \le \theta \le \pi$, $ \displaystyle \int_{0}^{\theta} \ln(\sin x) \ dx = - \theta \ln 2 - \frac{1}{2} \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{\sin (2n \theta)}{n^{2}}$.Also show that for $0 \le \theta \le \frac{\pi}{2}$, $ \displaystyle \int_{0}^{\theta} \ln(\cos x) \ dx = - \theta \ln 2 + \frac{1}{2} \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} (-1)^{n+1} \frac{\sin (2n \theta)}{n^{2}}$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I quite agree, RV... Very interesting! (Heidy)I'll not answer that one for reasons we both understand, but if it's not entirely impertinent of me - which it might well be :o - I'd like to propose the following one for you... Something to get you teeth into.For $$a,\, b,\, c > 0 \in \mathbb{R}$$, $$m\in \mathbb{Z}^+\ge 1$$, and $$0 < \theta \le \pi/2$$, find the additional conditions on the parameters as well as the closed form solution for:$$\int_0^{\theta}\log^m(a+b\cos x +c\sin x)\,dx$$
 
I have been insisting to my statistics students that for probabilities, the rule is the number of significant figures is the number of digits past the leading zeros or leading nines. For example to give 4 significant figures for a probability: 0.000001234 and 0.99999991234 are the correct number of decimal places. That way the complementary probability can also be given to the same significant figures ( 0.999998766 and 0.00000008766 respectively). More generally if you have a value that...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K