MHB Log-sine and log-cosine integrals

  • Thread starter Thread starter polygamma
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integrals
polygamma
Messages
227
Reaction score
0
For a few of you, this probably isn't very challenging. But I'm going to post it anyways since I find it interesting.
Show that for $0 \le \theta \le \pi$, $ \displaystyle \int_{0}^{\theta} \ln(\sin x) \ dx = - \theta \ln 2 - \frac{1}{2} \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{\sin (2n \theta)}{n^{2}}$.Also show that for $0 \le \theta \le \frac{\pi}{2}$, $ \displaystyle \int_{0}^{\theta} \ln(\cos x) \ dx = - \theta \ln 2 + \frac{1}{2} \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} (-1)^{n+1} \frac{\sin (2n \theta)}{n^{2}}$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I quite agree, RV... Very interesting! (Heidy)I'll not answer that one for reasons we both understand, but if it's not entirely impertinent of me - which it might well be :o - I'd like to propose the following one for you... Something to get you teeth into.For $$a,\, b,\, c > 0 \in \mathbb{R}$$, $$m\in \mathbb{Z}^+\ge 1$$, and $$0 < \theta \le \pi/2$$, find the additional conditions on the parameters as well as the closed form solution for:$$\int_0^{\theta}\log^m(a+b\cos x +c\sin x)\,dx$$
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top