Logarithm equation with different base

  • Thread starter Thread starter songoku
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Base Logarithm
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
7 replies · 2K views
songoku
Messages
2,514
Reaction score
395

Homework Statement


Find x that satisfies:

log11 (x3 + x2 - 20x) = log5 (x3 + x2 - 20x)


Homework Equations


logarithm


The Attempt at a Solution


x3 + x2 - 20x = 1

x3 + x2 - 20x - 1 = 0

Then stuck...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Edit: Disregard that. I was incorrect.
 
Last edited:
songoku said:

Homework Statement


Find x that satisfies:

log11 (x3 + x2 - 20x) = log5 (x3 + x2 - 20x)

Homework Equations


logarithm

The Attempt at a Solution


x3 + x2 - 20x = 1

x3 + x2 - 20x - 1 = 0

Then stuck...
Actually folks, this is correct:
x3 + x2 - 20x = 1 .​
The only way for log5(u) = log11(u) is for u = 1 .

That cubic function does not factor nicely.
 
bossman27 said:
I'm not sure what you're trying to do in your attempt at a solution...

Think of it this way:

[itex]log_{11}(x^{3}+x^{2}-20 x) = log_{5}(x^{3}+x^{2}-20x)[/itex]

means [itex]11^{k} = 5^{k} = x^{3}+x^{2}-20x[/itex].

So what can "k" be for this: [itex](11^{k} = 5^{k})[/itex] to hold? I think you might have assumed it must be 1, but that is not correct.

Since RHS and LHS have different base, the only possible case for RHS = LHS is when the argument of the log = 1

For your hint:
11k = 5k is only correct for k = 0. It means that the argument of the log = 0, which is not correct since log 0 is undefined.

Or maybe I get it wrong?

Thanks
 
songoku said:
x3 + x2 - 20x - 1 = 0

Then stuck...

You are not lucky with your book of problems. That equation has only complex roots. Check it at wolframalpha.com.
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=x^3+%2B+x^2+-+20x+-+1+%3D+0

ehild
 
ehild said:
You are not lucky with your book of problems. That equation has only complex roots. Check it at wolframalpha.com.
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=x^3+%2B+x^2+-+20x+-+1+%3D+0

ehild

Hm...using my calculator, I got three real roots. They are:

x = - 4.9776
x = 4.02750
x = - 0.04988

And those numbers are really similar to the x-intercept of root plot (diagram) of wolframalpha. But I don't understand why there are also three alternatives complex solutions.

OK, the point is this equation can't be solved manually.

Thanks a lot for the help :smile:
 
songoku said:
Hm...using my calculator, I got three real roots. They are:

x = - 4.9776
x = 4.02750
x = - 0.04988

And those numbers are really similar to the x-intercept of root plot (diagram) of wolframalpha. But I don't understand why there are also three alternatives complex solutions.

OK, the point is this equation can't be solved manually.

Thanks a lot for the help :smile:

Well, even wolframalpha can be wrong.

ehild
 
songoku said:
Hm...using my calculator, I got three real roots. They are:

x = - 4.9776
x = 4.02750
x = - 0.04988

And those numbers are really similar to the x-intercept of root plot (diagram) of wolframalpha. But I don't understand why there are also three alternatives complex solutions.

OK, the point is this equation can't be solved manually.

Thanks a lot for the help :smile:
The fact that the roots given by WolframAlpha are complex, is likely an artifact of whatever numerical method is being used there. The imaginary part of the roots listed there is extremely small relative to the real part, with the real part matching the roots as you have listed them and the imaginary part on the order of 10-15 .