Logarithm of negative base to a number resulting in even

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
10 replies · 3K views
Logical Dog
Messages
362
Reaction score
97
Negative number multiplied by itself an even number of times gives us a positive number.

Why does log to -10 base of 100 not equal 2?

thanks in advance.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You cannot extend that to a function over anything apart from a few selected integers. How would that be useful?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Logical Dog
Bipolar Demon said:
Why does log to -10 base of 100 not equal 2?
Your question only makes sense in the complex domain, so:
[itex]\log_{-10}(100)=\frac{\log(100)}{\log(-10)}=\frac{2\cdot \log(10)}{\log(10)+(2n+1)\pi i}[/itex] where n is an integer (the complex logarithm is not single-valued). Thus, even if you put n=0, the answer is not going to be 2.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Logical Dog and micromass
mfb said:
You cannot extend that to a function over anything apart from a few selected integers. How would that be useful?
ok
Svein said:
Your question only makes sense in the complex domain, so:
[itex]\log_{-10}(100)=\frac{\log(100)}{\log(-10)}=\frac{2\cdot \log(10)}{\log(10)+(2n+1)\pi i}[/itex] where n is an integer (the complex logarithm is not single-valued). Thus, even if you put n=0, the answer is not going to be 2.

:oldconfused::redface:
 
Last edited:
Svein's post is a more mathematical version of "you could not extend this to anything useful" - you would run into weird results everywhere.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Logical Dog
On reflection, my answer is too simple, a more correct answer is [itex]\log_{-10}(100)=\frac{\log(100)}{\log(-10)}=\frac{2\cdot \log(10)+2m\pi i}{\log(10)+(2n+1)\pi i}[/itex] where m and n are integers. The expression can be simplified somewhat, but none of the results are going to be 2.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Logical Dog
Bipolar Demon said:
Why does log to -10 base of 100 not equal 2?
Just as a side comment, what you wrote is not clear. It would be clearer as ##\log_{-10}(100)## or in words as "log, base -10, of 100".
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Logical Dog
Svein said:
On reflection, my answer is too simple, a more correct answer is [itex]\log_{-10}(100)=\frac{\log(100)}{\log(-10)}=\frac{2\cdot \log(10)+2m\pi i}{\log(10)+(2n+1)\pi i}[/itex] where m and n are integers. The expression can be simplified somewhat, but none of the results are going to be 2.

Take ##m=1## and ##n=0##, you do get

[tex]\frac{2\cdot \log(10)+2\pi i}{\log(10)+\pi i} = 2 \frac{\log(10)+\pi i}{\log(10)+\pi i} = 2[/tex]

So ##2## is a value of ##\log_{-10}(100)##, as it should be. But it's not the only value.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Logical Dog
micromass said:
Take ##m=1## and ##n=0##, you do get

[tex]\frac{2\cdot \log(10)+2\pi i}{\log(10)+\pi i} = 2 \frac{\log(10)+\pi i}{\log(10)+\pi i} = 2[/tex]

So ##2## is a value of ##\log_{-10}(100)##, as it should be. But it's not the only value.
:-pTalk about missing the obvious. One demerit for me!