Logarithms and what they are for.

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jasonlr82794
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Logarithms
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the purpose and applications of logarithms in mathematics and various fields. Participants explore theoretical concepts, practical uses, and historical context related to logarithms, including their role in simplifying calculations and their application in real-world scenarios.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Historical

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express confusion about the purpose of logarithms, questioning their utility in mathematical operations.
  • Others explain that logarithms serve as the inverse of exponential functions, providing a way to graphically represent data that spans wide ranges of values.
  • A participant provides an example of data that can be effectively graphed using semi-logarithmic paper, illustrating the practical application of logarithms in visualizing exponential growth.
  • One participant discusses the use of logarithms in electronics, particularly in the context of filters and transfer functions, emphasizing their role in managing wide ranges of frequency and amplitude.
  • Another participant highlights the historical significance of logarithms in simplifying arithmetic calculations before the advent of calculators, mentioning their use in slide rules and logarithmic tables.
  • A participant introduces the concept of pH, explaining how it is defined using logarithms and how it relates to real-world measurements of acidity.
  • Some participants discuss the natural occurrence of logarithmic relationships in various physical scenarios, such as perception of load, where the increase in perception is proportional to relative rather than absolute changes.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the utility of logarithms in various applications, but there remains some confusion and lack of consensus regarding their foundational understanding and specific mathematical properties.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about the mathematical details of logarithmic functions and their graphical representations. Additionally, the discussion touches on historical practices that may not be widely understood by all participants.

jasonlr82794
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
The math behind the logarithms isn't hard especially if you can remember where things go and how the math is worked out but what are they for? What do they do and why are they used? Maybe I am missing what they are used for in the math but it really just doesn't make sense. You have a base number and have to figure out what the exponential number is but why use this?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The natural log function, ln, is the inverse of the natural exponential function. If y = ex, then x = ln(y). Both equations describe exactly the same pairs of numbers, meaning that any point (x, y) on the graph of either is also on the other graph.

A practical reason for using logarithms is to narrow a range of values that differs by many orders of magnitude. A function f that grows exponentially exhibits this behavior. Instead of graphing the exponential function y = f(x), it can be helpful to graph the log of the function values; i.e., y1 = ln(f(x)), which will yield a straight-line graph. This is the reason behind semi-log graph paper, which can be used to determine a formula for data that doesn't fit a line or low-degree polynomial.
 
So in the first paragraph you are saying that those two functions graphed out are the inverses which will look like a regular inverse and noninverse function on the graph? The second paragraph is kind of vague to me, could you add some math in that?
 
jasonlr82794 said:
So in the first paragraph you are saying that those two functions graphed out are the inverses which will look like a regular inverse and noninverse function on the graph?
No, I am saying that there is only one graph. You can call it y = ex or you can call it x = ln(y). If a pair of numbers (x, y) is on the first graph, exactly the same pair is on the other graph.

I don't know what you mean by "regular inverse" and "noninverse" functions.
jasonlr82794 said:
The second paragraph is kind of vague to me, could you add some math in that?

For an example of what I was talking about, consider this set of data:
{(1, .03), (2, .3), (3, 3), (4, 30), (5, 300), (6, 3000)}

You would be hard-pressed to graph this data (which I cooked up as an example). If you graphed this on semi-log graph paper, which has an ordinary scale along one edge and is logarithmic along the other edge, you could graph this data easily, and could determine a formula that fits it.
 
jasonlr82794 said:
The math behind the logarithms isn't hard especially if you can remember where things go and how the math is worked out but what are they for? What do they do and why are they used? Maybe I am missing what they are used for in the math but it really just doesn't make sense. You have a base number and have to figure out what the exponential number is but why use this?

As Mark44 said, they are often useful when dealing with quantities that vary over a very wide range of values. For example, in electronics, we often deal with filters and transfer functions of amplifiers, where the frequency range is very wide (like 1Hz to 100MHz), and the amplitude response can be very wide as well (like a few volts RMS down to 1uVrms). The most practical way to deal with those kinds of wide ranges is to take the log of the values, to give you more reasonable numbers to deal with.

In engineering, we use the "decibel" (dB) definition to use logarithms to deal with these wide ranges. For voltages, we make this definition:

V[dBV] = 20 log (V/1V)

or

V[dBuV] = 20 log (V/1uV)

So 1Vpp is the same as 0dBV, or +60dBuV. 1uVpp is the same as 0dBuV or -60dBV.

Using logarithms let's us deal with a factor of 60, instead of a factor of a million in the above examples.
 
Last edited:
Logarithms were used for many years before the invention of mechanical and electronic calculators to simplify arithmetic calculations. For example, knowing the logarithm of two numbers, one could multiply them together by adding their logarithms, and then using this sum to find the product by using a table of logarithm values. Similarly, taking the logarithm of a number and multiplying it by 2 could be used to find the square of a number; dividing the logarithm by 2 could be used to find the square root. Slide rules used a logarithmic scale in order to find products, quotients, powers, roots, etc.

In many textbooks printed before 1970 or so, one of the standard appendices included in the back was a table of logarithms to help students with the calculations needed to solve the problems in the book. All of these tables have since disappeared (like slide rules) because inexpensive calculators are so common.
 
Ever heard about thing called pH - which describes acidity of the solutions? Well, it is -log(H+ concentration). pH of a solution of a strong acid is typically around 0 or 1 (which means concentration of H+ is 1 or 0.1 mol/L), pH in your stomach is somewhere bettween 2 and 3 (0.01-0.001 mol/L), beer is around 3-4 (10-3-10-4 mol/L), pure water should be around 7 but is usually slightly more acidic with pH between 5-6, your blood keeps pH of 7.3, bleach has pH of 12 and so on.

pH not only uses logarithm because it was defined this way, turns out in many cases real world answers linearly to pH. If you take a glass electrode (used for pH measurements in pH meters) and you plug it into water, it will take potential that is directly proportional to pH - not to the H+ concentration. So apparently we have not "invented" logarithms, we just "rediscovered" them long after real world was using them :wink:.
 
In every physical case where two quantities are related in such a way that the increase of quantity A is proportional to the relative increase in quantity B, logarithms will be a natural way to describe the relationship.

Borek has meantioned one such case, there are numbers of others.

For example, for perceptions, say perception of load you carry, the heightening of perception of carried load will typically be proportional to the relative increase of the load you carry, rather than proportional to the absolute increase of the load you carry.

If you already carry 25 kg, you won't even perceive a load increase of 10 grams, something you certainly would do if you only carried 5 grams prior to the increase.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K