Let's say we have a set S, and a function f : S -> S. Now let S be endowed with a binary operation, forming a group G. Is it correct to write f : G - > G?(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Up to now I have been operating on the assumption that yes, although G is not technically a set, there is little harm in being sloppy and use G to designate its underlying set, S.

However someone has recently told me that this is not correct. f : G - > G is different from f : S - > S. I was referred to category theory, of which I admittedly know nothing.

Is this true?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Logical distinction between sets and algebraic structures

Loading...

Similar Threads - Logical distinction between | Date |
---|---|

B Conditional Probability, Independence, and Dependence | Dec 29, 2017 |

B Empty domains and the vacuous truth | Dec 26, 2017 |

B About Fitch's paradox | Nov 8, 2017 |

I The truth value of ##P(x)## → ##Q(x)## | Aug 30, 2017 |

Pemutations of n objects not all distinct | Dec 3, 2014 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**