Logical Proofs Regarding Sets and Subsets

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on logical proofs related to sets and subsets, specifically addressing the relationship between sets A and B. The key concept established is that if A is a subset of B (A ⊆ B), then for any element x, if x is a member of A, it must also be a member of B, expressed as ∀x[x ∈ A ⇒ x ∈ B]. The discussion also explores proving that the complement of B is a subset of the complement of A (¬B ⊆ ¬A) by starting with an element in ¬B and demonstrating its absence in A through logical reasoning.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of set theory concepts, including subsets and complements.
  • Familiarity with logical quantifiers and implications.
  • Knowledge of basic set identities and rules of logic.
  • Ability to construct logical proofs in mathematics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of set complements and their relationships.
  • Learn about logical quantifiers in greater depth, focusing on universal and existential quantifiers.
  • Explore advanced set theory topics, such as power sets and Cartesian products.
  • Practice constructing formal proofs using direct proof techniques and proof by contradiction.
USEFUL FOR

Students of mathematics, particularly those studying set theory, logic, and proof construction. This discussion is beneficial for anyone looking to strengthen their understanding of logical proofs involving sets and subsets.

enkrypt0r
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The following is all the information needed:

07rEA.png


Homework Equations



There are, of course, all the basic rules of logic and set identities to be considered.

The Attempt at a Solution



Not really sure how to attempt this one, to be honest. I know that (A ⊆ B) can be written with a quantifier and is equivalent to ∀x[xϵA ⇒ xϵB] but I'm really not sure how to apply this information properly.

Thanks, guys. :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If A is a subset of B, then we know that any element of A is also an element of B.

Now, what if we take an element of U, that is not an element of B. What does that mean? Could such an element be an element of A?
 
In general you prove set X is a subset of set Y by starting "if x is a member of X" and then using the definitions of X and Y, and any other information you are given, to conclude "x is a member of Y".

To prove [itex]\overline{B}\subset\overline{A}[/itex] start with "if x is a member of [itex]\overline{B}[/itex] then x is not in B. Since, by hypothesis, [itex]A\subset B[/itex] x is not in A. ...
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K