A LogLikelihood - Poisson distribution

Zuzana
Messages
12
Reaction score
1
Hello :)
I try to fit some parameters of the particle (e.g. energy, direction) be means of log-likelihood minimization.
Input data to likelihood function are pulses amplitudes, while Poisson distribution is used. However, the problem is that Poisson distribution is as follows
1661160531826.png

i.e. for higher pulse amplitute there is a lower Poisson probability and thus higher likelihood value. However, pulses with higher amplitudes are very important in the event and the probability for them should be higher, not? Please, do you know how to correct this effect? Or what would you suggest to do?

Thank you very much in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What are you comparing?
 
mathman said:
What are you comparing?
number of photoelectrons. measured vs expected
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.
Back
Top