- #1

ChrisVer

Gold Member

- 3,380

- 461

Can you reliably use a Poisson function to fit on data that seem to be Gaussian distributed (although that is due to the large number of the mean)?

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- I
- Thread starter ChrisVer
- Start date

- #1

ChrisVer

Gold Member

- 3,380

- 461

Can you reliably use a Poisson function to fit on data that seem to be Gaussian distributed (although that is due to the large number of the mean)?

- #2

Stephen Tashi

Science Advisor

- 7,638

- 1,493

For the question to be interpreted in any specific way, you need to describe the data (precisely).

- #3

chiro

Science Advisor

- 4,790

- 132

Poisson distributions (and Poisson processes) are constructed from very specific first principles where they represent rates as a limit to a Binomial distribution (with certain properties).

Usually these processes model rates and similar phenomena - you might want to tell us what you are trying to do so we can give further feedback.

- #4

FactChecker

Science Advisor

Gold Member

- 6,182

- 2,389

You might also want to check the sample skewness. It should be close to λ

PS. I am not sure how to define "close to" for the sample variance and skew. Maybe you can Google a confidence interval.

- #5

ChrisVer

Gold Member

- 3,380

- 461

I thought about fitting on it, to get the Var, but at the end I chose to integrate it and find the +/- 34%

- #6

- 22,089

- 3,296

I thought about fitting on it, to get the Var, but at the end I chose to integrate it and find the +/- 34%

Have you tried to transform your histograms? like take the logarithm of the data often makes things more symmetric.

- #7

ChrisVer

Gold Member

- 3,380

- 461

- #8

- 22,089

- 3,296

That's an example of a histo...

Try a Box-Cox transformation to make it more normal.

- #9

chiro

Science Advisor

- 4,790

- 132

Transforming data out of context is not a good idea and depending on what resolutions you are trying to make it can actually be detrimental to getting a useful inference.

- #10

ChrisVer

Gold Member

- 3,380

- 461

not add bins in order to find the +/- 34.1% errors to the red line, which can be binning dependent.

but instead fit a function on the distribution, and integrate that function around the red line to get the +/-34.1%.

Obviously the distribution is not Gaussian, but looks more like a Poisson....

I was thinking about rescaling the x-axis [since Poisson is accepting integer entries while I have floats], doing the fit, integrating, and then scale everything [together with the obtained variances] back to the original x-axis.

The point is that I have other distributions which look pretty much like Gaussians, and I wanted to make sure I could use a Poisson to fit them too [since the code should do that, I wouldn't want to check everytime the distribution and determine with what I could fit it with].

- #11

chiro

Science Advisor

- 4,790

- 132

I'd look at Gamma, Chi-square and other generalized distributions of these for more. You'll find they can deal with these bumps and skewness and you can estimate the parameters of these distributions and do goodness of fit tests.

Share: