Long distance electrical transmission efficiency

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the efficiency of long-distance electrical transmission over 3000 km, highlighting calculations related to magnetic field strength, resistance, power loss, and temperature rise of the transmission wire. Key calculations indicate that the total resistance of the wire would be 300 ohms, leading to significant power losses of 1.2 million watts, which negatively impacts efficiency. The estimated temperature rise of the wire is approximately 3.17 degrees Celsius, assuming heat dissipation into the environment. Concerns are raised about the clarity of calculations and the need for accurate unit matching, as well as the implications of wire cooling on temperature estimates. Overall, the thread emphasizes the complexities involved in long-distance electrical transmission efficiency.
MrSargeant
Messages
1
Reaction score
1
TL;DR Summary: Just need help with verification of data submitte

1 of 94

Efficiency distance over 3000 km +, plus Temperature over that distance​


  • 1-inch amorphous magnetic core
  • 0.05 microns graphene
  • 0.10 microns metallic PZT
  • Helical copper wire with 15 mm diameter spaced 0.01 mm apart
  • Pulsed current of 5000 A
B = μ₀ * μ_r * N * I / L

  • B is the magnetic field strength (in Tesla)
  • μ₀ is the vacuum permeability constant (4π x 10^-7 T·m/A)
  • μ_r is the relative permeability of the core material
  • N is the number of turns in the coil
  • I is the current passing through the coil (in amperes)
  • L is the length of the coil (in meters)
Assuming the amorphous magnetic core has a relative permeability (μ_r) of 100,000, a current (I) of 5000 A (pulsed), and approximately 225 turns (N), we need to determine the length (L) of the coil.
If we assume that the coil is wrapped tightly around the 1inch (0.0508 m) core and the wire thickness is 15 mm (0.015 m) with a spacing of 0.01 mm (0.00001 m) between the turns, the length of the coil will be approximately:

L = (0.015 + 0.00001) * 225 = 3.3765 m
Now, we can calculate the magnetic field strength:
B = (4π x 10^-7 T·m/A) * 100,000 * 225 * 5000 A / 3.3765 m ≈ 13,187 T

Assuming a 1/2 inch core and a wire with a resistance of 0.1 ohms per kilometer, the total resistance of the wire over a distance of 3000 km would be:

R_total = R * L = 0.1 ohms/km * 3000 km = 300 ohms
Using the power (P) and voltage (V) levels given, we can calculate the current (I) flowing through the transmission line using Ohm's law:
I = P / V = 1,000,000,000 W / 500,000 V = 2000 A
The power lost due to the resistance of the transmission line can be calculated using Joule's law:
P_loss = I^2 * R_total = (2000 A)^2 * 300 ohms = 1.2 * 10^7 W
To calculate the efficiency of the transmission, we need to subtract the power lost from the total power transmitted:
P_transmitted = P - P_loss = 1,000,000,000 W - 1.2 * 10^7 W = 9.88 * 10^8 W
The efficiency of the transmission is then:
efficiency = P_transmitted / P = 9.88 * 10^8 W / 1,000,000,000 W = 0.988 = 98.8
Below is a hypothetical calculation
  1. Resistance per unit length of the wire (R): 0.1 ohms per kilometer
  2. Power (P): 1 GW (1,000,000,000 W)
  3. Voltage level (V): 500 kV (500,000 V)
  4. Length of the transmission line (L): 3000 km
Now we can calculate the energy efficiency using the following steps:
  1. Calculate the total resistance of the wire (R_total): R_total = R * L = 0.1 ohms/km * 3000 km = 300 ohms
  2. Calculate the current (I) flowing through the wire: I = P / V = 1,000,000,000 W / 500,000 V = 2000 A
  3. Calculate the total power loss in the transmission line due to resistance (P_loss): P_loss = I^2 * R_total = (2000 A)^2 * 300 ohms = 1,200,000,000 W
  4. Calculate the energy efficiency (η) of the transmission line: η = (P - P_loss) / P = (1,000,000,000 W - 1,200,000,000 W) / 1,000,000,000 W = -0.2
Temperature of transmission wire..

Assuming a 1/2 inch core and a wire with a resistance of 0.1 ohms per kilometer, the total resistance of the wire over a distance of 3000 km would be:
R_total = R * L = 0.1 ohms/km * 3000 km = 300 ohms
Using the power (P) and voltage (V) levels given, we can calculate the current (I) flowing through the transmission line using Ohm's law:
I = P / V = 1,000,000,000 W / 500,000 V = 2000 A
The power lost due to the resistance of the transmission line can be calculated using Joule's law:
P_loss = I^2 * R_total = (2000 A)^2 * 300 ohms = 1.2 * 10^7 W
Assuming that the heat generated from the power loss is dissipated into the surrounding environment, the temperature rise of the wire can be estimated using the equation:
ΔT = P_loss / (m * c)
where ΔT is the temperature rise, P_loss is the power loss, m is the mass of the wire, and c is the specific heat capacity of the wire material.
Assuming a copper wire with a diameter of 15 mm and a length of 3000 km, the mass of the wire can be estimated using the density of copper (8.96 g/cm^3):
m = π * (d/2)^2 * L * ρ = π * (1.5 cm / 2)^2 * 3000 km * 8.96 g/cm^3 ≈ 8.88 * 10^9 g
Assuming a specific heat capacity of copper of 0.385 J/g·K, the temperature rise of the wire can be estimated as:
ΔT = P_loss / (m * c) = 1.2 * 10^7 W / (8.88 * 10^9 g * 0.385 J/g·K) ≈ 3.17 K
Therefore, assuming that the heat generated from the power loss is dissipated into the surrounding environment, the temperature rise of the wire over a distance of 3000 km would be approximately 3.17 degrees Celsius.[Moderator's note: moved from a technical forum.]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
1 of 94?
 
What's the initial calculation of some coil doing? How is that connected to the rest of the thread?
Why do you calculate some things two or three times?
These things make the post needlessly harder to follow.

Transmission over 3000 km needs 6000 km of wire so your losses will be doubled.
ΔT = P_loss / (m * c) = 1.2 * 10^7 W / (8.88 * 10^9 g * 0.385 J/g·K) ≈ 3.17 K
Check your units, they don't match.

If you don't consider how the wire is cooled, how could you possibly get a temperature difference instead of a rate of temperature increase?
 
Thread 'Minimum mass of a block'
Here we know that if block B is going to move up or just be at the verge of moving up ##Mg \sin \theta ## will act downwards and maximum static friction will act downwards ## \mu Mg \cos \theta ## Now what im confused by is how will we know " how quickly" block B reaches its maximum static friction value without any numbers, the suggested solution says that when block A is at its maximum extension, then block B will start to move up but with a certain set of values couldn't block A reach...
TL;DR Summary: Find Electric field due to charges between 2 parallel infinite planes using Gauss law at any point Here's the diagram. We have a uniform p (rho) density of charges between 2 infinite planes in the cartesian coordinates system. I used a cube of thickness a that spans from z=-a/2 to z=a/2 as a Gaussian surface, each side of the cube has area A. I know that the field depends only on z since there is translational invariance in x and y directions because the planes are...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Back
Top