Power Transmitted in a Coaxial Cable

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a coaxial transmission line with specific parameters, including the inner and outer conductor radii, characteristic impedance, and maximum electric field strength. The goal is to estimate the maximum mean radio-frequency power that can be transmitted along the line.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of Gauss's law to relate the electric field and potential difference, questioning the validity of certain equations and derivations. There are inquiries about the geometry of the cable and its relation to the characteristic impedance. Some participants suggest using Laplace's equation and Gauss's theorem to find the potential without relying on certain integrals.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with various participants questioning assumptions and derivations. Some guidance has been provided regarding the use of Gauss's theorem and the need to clarify the geometry of the coaxial cable. There is no explicit consensus, but multiple lines of reasoning are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the need for specific data regarding the outer radius of the coaxial cable, which is essential for further calculations. There is also mention of the requirement for an rms power figure, which adds to the complexity of the problem.

Marcus95
Messages
50
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


A coaxial transmission line consists of an inner cylindrical conductor of radius a = 1 mm and a
cylindrical outer conductor chosen to make the characteristic impedance 75 ohm. The space
between the conductors is lled with a gas which can stand a maximum eld of 105 V/m
without dielectric breakdown. Estimate the maximum mean radio-frequency power that
can be transmitted along this line into a matching load.

Homework Equations


On transmission line
## Z = \sqrt{L/C} ##
For coaxial with radius a and b:
##C = \frac{2\pi \epsilon \epsilon_0}{ln(b/a)} ##
##L = \frac{\mu_0 ln(b/a)}{2\pi} ##

The Attempt at a Solution


The voltage between the two conductors is by Gauss's law:
## V = \int \boldsymbol{E} \cdot d\boldsymbol{r} = E_0 ln(b/a) ##
hence:
## V_{max} = E_{max} ln(b/a) ##
also:
##Z = \sqrt{\mu / \epsilon \epsilon_0} \frac{ln(b/a)}{2\pi} ##
Using ##P = VI = V^2/Z ## and asuuming ##epsilon \approx 1## gives:
##P_{max} = 0.21 GW##, but the answer is supposed to be 104 W.

What am I doing wrong? Many thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Marcus95 said:
The voltage between the two conductors is by Gauss's law:$$
V = \int \boldsymbol{E} \cdot d\boldsymbol{r} = E_0 ln(b/a)$$
This equation doesn't make sense. The left side is in volts, the right side is in volts/meter. Check your derivation.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Marcus95
kuruman said:
This equation doesn't make sense. The left side is in volts, the right side is in volts/meter. Check your derivation.
Thank you, I got it!
 
kuruman said:
This equation doesn't make sense. The left side is in volts, the right side is in volts/meter. Check your derivation.
I had my doubts about this step but for another reason. There is vector potential ##A## inside coaxial cable, so it is
##E=\nabla V+\frac{\partial A}{\partial t}##

so that
##V=\int Edr## doesn't hold (because it is equivalent to ##E=\nabla V##.
Do we make the approximation ##A\approx 0 ##?
 
It's not necessary to invoke the magnetic potential.

You want to use Gauss's theorem to relate E field to potential difference between the conductors. So first you want to determine the geometry of the cable, i.e. the inner and outer radii. Is there a relation between these radii and Z0?

Then: use Gauss's theorem relating the E field to the potential difference V and the geometry and compute the max. allowable V for the given max. E.

Don't forget they want the rms power figure (I think - wording is not clear to me). Also assume an ideal matched line.
 
rude man said:
It's not necessary to invoke the magnetic potential. Then: use Gauss's theorem relating the E field to the potential difference V and the geometry and compute the max. allowable V for the given max. E.

Don't forget they want the rms power figure (I think - wording is not clear to me). Also assume an ideal matched line.
Can you show how you find V using Gauss's theorem(have to solve Poisson's equation?) without using that ##V=\int Edr## because that last integral becomes path dependent when there is vector potential.
 
Delta² said:
Can you show how you find V using Gauss's theorem(have to solve Poisson's equation?) without using that ##V=\int Edr## because that last integral becomes path dependent when there is vector potential.
Delta² said:
Can you show how you find V using Gauss's theorem(have to solve Poisson's equation?) without using that ##V=\int Edr## because that last integral becomes path dependent when there is vector potential.

We are dealing solely with electric, not magnetic, fields. I have never run into a vector potential such that E = ∇ x Ae the way we write H = ∇ x A (or sometimes B = ∇ x A). The former is in fact impossible if there is charge present since ∇⋅E = ρ, not zero, so no vector potential can exist. In any case, forget all vector potentials.

You can relate V to E by solving Laplace's equation for the space between the conductors but you'd still need to do step 1 below. It would in fact be good to do so as a check if you went with my suggestion which is:

(1) Find the outer radius of said space; (2) relate E(r) to V, the potential between the conductors using Gauss; (3) find where E is the largest, then you can determine the max. allowable V given the max allowable E.

To do step 1 you will need one item of data given to you.
 
Last edited:
Actually, solving Laplace's equation is the more direct route. Use the cylindrical coordinate expression ∇2V = (1/r) d/dr (r dV/dr) = 0 since there are no derivatives with respect to θ or z.

But again, your first task is to find the outer radius of the space between the conductors.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
15K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K