Long Distance Wireless Power Transmission

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility and methods of long-distance wireless power transmission, exploring theoretical approaches, practical challenges, and historical context. Participants examine various technologies, including zenneck waves, while expressing skepticism about the viability of such systems.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asserts that magnetic fields and radio waves cannot achieve long-distance power transmission due to energy loss with distance, suggesting alternative methods involving the Earth and upper atmosphere.
  • Another participant expresses skepticism about the practicality of using zenneck waves for power transmission, citing numerous reasons for doubt.
  • A concern is raised regarding the economic implications of wireless power transmission, particularly the potential for energy theft and its incompatibility with current energy markets.
  • Some participants reference patents and claims from companies like Viziv, questioning their validity and how they could achieve effective power transmission.
  • One participant emphasizes the need for peer-reviewed sources to substantiate claims made in the discussion, expressing skepticism about the historical context of wireless power transmission being associated with pseudoscience.
  • Another participant provides links to patents and articles related to zenneck waves, arguing that these sources are adequate for discussion.
  • Technical critiques are made regarding the claims in the patents, including concerns about the lack of a power transmission line and potential errors in the patent claims.
  • A participant contrasts the theoretical aspects of zenneck waves with Tesla's vision of powering cities, suggesting that practical applications remain limited.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants exhibit a mix of skepticism and interest, with no consensus on the feasibility of long-distance wireless power transmission. Various competing views are presented regarding the validity of the technologies discussed and their practical implications.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations in the discussion, including the need for more rigorous sources and the historical baggage associated with the topic. There are unresolved technical claims and assumptions regarding the patents and their implications for power transmission.

WonderfulWorld
Messages
4
Reaction score
1
TL;DR
Long Distance Wireless Power Transmission
Hi Everyone,

I wanted to get the communities take on this. Long distance wireless power transmission. I know that you cannot accomplish this with magnetic fields or with radio waves because the energy falls of with the square of the distance but I have been reading about some unique methods to accomplish this task. One method mentions using the Earth and upper atmosphere and another entertains the idea of using a zenneck wave to accomplish the task. There is actually a company in Texas that his built a rather larger tower, comparable to Teslas Wardenclyffe to generate and transmit these zenneck waves. What do you guys think?

http://ncoic.com/theory.htm
https://vizivtechnologies.com/
https://patents.google.com/patent/CA2788912A1/en?oq=zenneck+wave
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I think it is true that a surface wave falls off as 1/r.
I think it is an extremely improbable idea to transmit power that way for myriad of reasons.
 
The price of energy is quoted in dollars per megajoule.
You must buy the energy before it is transmitted.
How will you prevent thieves tapping into the transmission and taking the energy for free?
To a thief, free energy is exchangable for money.
The concept of wireless power transmission is incompatible with the economy.
 
From what I gather in the additional patents by Viziv they claim to have this figured. I say claimed because I'm not sure how they could accomplish the task.
 
WonderfulWorld said:
Summary:: Long Distance Wireless Power Transmission

I wanted to get the communities take on this.
I'm skeptical about this topic. The topic has a long history of pseudoscience, wild claims and shattered dreams.

If you want a discussion, post some links to peer reviewed papers from reputable sources, plus patent applications, not press releases, not popsci sources. We shouldn't ask members to spend their time discussing without knowledge of specifically what the discussion is about.

If we don't have those links by tomorrow, I'm going to close the thread. Meanwhile, I recommend that we all hold off comments in this thread until we have the links.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn, russ_watters and berkeman
I definitely agree with you there that the subject is tainted but I did provide a patent and a website link to a company that has raised millions in venture capital to fund this project. How is that not adequate? I think you missed the third link. Provided with this post is one patent detailing the zenneck wave used to transmit on lossy media AKA the Earth that you can find with the following link. If you type zenneck wave in google patents you will find a lot of patents:

https://patents.google.com/patent/US9912031B2/en?q=zenneck+wave&oq=zenneck+wave

Here is a link on hackaday showing the tower itself:

https://hackaday.com/2019/11/20/texas-tesla-tower-titillates/

Zenneck wave Related paper:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6976601/
 
You're right. I did miss the links. I will take time to study them.
 
When reading the patent; for "probe", read "tower";
for "polyphase waveguide" read "Earth – Ionosphere waveguide".

I see no power transmission line to the site, to provide the energy for transmission. That is consistent with the second claim in the patent; "2. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein a radiation resistance of the polyphase waveguide probe is substantially zero." Zero radiation resistance does imply zero voltage, and therefore zero power.

There is also what appears to be an error in claim 13, where it refers to “Tree-space wavelength”. That error cascades along into the following claims.

Tesla got there first, since then it has never been forgotten, indeed it has been published widely.
There is nothing “novel” in this patent. The circuit and probe appears to be a Tesla Coil.

I think this is a “long con”, looking for foolish investors to buy up the shares before it fails.

Or it is cover for an experimental high voltage discharge test site. The site appears to be designed to have two probes, one insulated on the main tower, the other based in the cylindrical second pit.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: anorlunda
From the paper you linked:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6976601/ said:
A decade ago, non-radiative wireless power transmission re-emerged as a promising alternative to deliver electrical power to devices where a physical wiring proved impracticable.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zenneck_wave said:
The Zenneck wave, Zenneck surface wave or Sommerfeld-Zenneck surface wave is a longitudinal, inhomogeneous or non-uniform electromagnetic plane wave incident at the complex Brewster's angle onto a planar or spherical boundary interface between two homogeneous media having different dielectric constants.

The paper is directed at tiny devices with a solid interface. Tesla's dream was to power remote cities through the atmosphere. The two ideas are figuratively miles apart.

For small quantities of power, wireless transmission is trivial. I can shine a flashlight on my solar watch.
1591970716074.png


A microwave oven can transmit larger quantities of power wirelessly, such as to my cup of coffee.

But applications even remotely approaching Tesla's dream -- no.

Since you mentioned Tesla's dream in the OP, this thread is closed.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman and davenn

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
11K
Replies
14
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
44K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K