member 11137
John86 said:http://arxiv.org/abs/1008.0283
Unknown system boundaries cannot be determined within quantum Darwinism
Authors: Chris Fields
(Submitted on 2 Aug 2010)
Abstract: Observers restricted to interactions with environmental degrees of freedom that nondestructively encode pointer states of a system of interest S cannot determine from such interactions which degrees of freedom of S interact directly or indirectly with the environment E. Without a specification of the S-E boundary, such observers cannot use einselection and quantum Darwinism to calculate the pointer states of S or their environmental encodings. Quantum Darwinism requires S-E boundary specifications assumed or stipulated on the basis of classical-scale observations, and therefore cannot be regarded as providing a predictive, purely quantum-mechanical explanation of the "emergence" of classicality.
http://arxiv.org/abs/1008.0373
Little Boxes: The Simplest Demonstration of the Failure of Einstein's Attempt to Show the Incompleteness of Quantum Theory
Authors: John D. Norton
(Submitted on 2 Aug 2010)
Abstract: The failure of Einstein's co-authored "EPR" attempt to show the incompleteness of quantum theory is demonstrated directly for spatial degrees of freedom using only elementary notions. A GHZ construction is realized in the position properties of three particles whose quantum waves are distributed over three two-chambered boxes. The same system is modeled more realistically using three spatially separated, singly ionized hydrogen molecules.
http://arxiv.org/abs/1008.0033
Emergent Photons and Gravitons:The Problem of Vacuum Structure
Authors: J. D. Bjorken
(Submitted on 30 Jul 2010)
Abstract: We discuss vacuum condensates associated with emergent QED and with torsion, as well as the possible role of the Kodama wave function in quantum cosmology
http://arxiv.org/abs/1008.0154
Gauge Theories under Incorporation of a Generalized Uncertainty Principle
Authors: Martin Kober
(Submitted on 1 Aug 2010)
Abstract: It is considered an extension of gauge theories according to the assumption of a generalized uncertainty principle which implies a minimal length scale. A modification of the usual uncertainty principle implies an extended shape of matter field equations like the Dirac equation. If it is postulated invariance of such a generalized field equation under local gauge transformations, the usual covariant derivative containing the gauge potential has to be replaced by a generalized covariant derivative. This leads to a generalized interaction between the matter field and the gauge field as well as to an additional self interaction of the gauge field. Since the existence of a minimal length scale seems to be a necessary assumption of any consistent quantum theory of gravity, the gauge principle is a constitutive ingredient of the standard model and even gravity can be described as gauge theory of local translations or Lorentz transformations, the presented extension of gauge theories appears as a very important consideration.
Thanks Marcus for all these very interesting references (I like the Bjorken's article on emergent photons and gravitons) and the introduction of considerations concerning the torsion into the theory. Respect for Martin Kober.