Lorentz tranformations and time slices

  • Thread starter Thread starter LegendLength
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lorentz Time
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of Lorentz transformations in the context of a 'block' view of the universe, specifically how time slices are represented for different observers. It is established that while Lorentz transformations do alter the perception of time and space for observers in different inertial frames, they do not necessitate separate 4D blocks for each observer. Instead, time slices can be represented as stretched rectangles, maintaining a linear transformation without complex warping. The transformations involve both time dilation and length contraction, affecting the entire spatial representation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lorentz transformations in special relativity
  • Familiarity with 3D space-time diagrams
  • Basic knowledge of time dilation and length contraction
  • Concept of inertial reference frames
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the mathematical derivation of Lorentz transformations
  • Study the implications of time dilation and length contraction in practical scenarios
  • Learn about 4D space-time diagrams and their applications in physics
  • Investigate the concept of basis vectors in different inertial frames
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of relativity, and anyone interested in understanding the geometric interpretation of space-time and the effects of Lorentz transformations on observers in different inertial frames.

LegendLength
Messages
21
Reaction score
1
I have a question about the way lorentz transformations work with respect to a 'block' view of the universe.

Take our universe as a 3d chart with 2 space dimensions and one time dimension (ignoring the other space dimension for simplicity). You chart it using some "god's eye view" reference frame, or just any single reference frame. So you end up with simultaneous events perpendicular to the time axis for any point in time. Each time slice is just a rectangle showing that moment in time (for the 'god-like' observer).

Now when you apply lorentz transformations for another observer, can you use that same chart? Is it true that the new observer just has a slightly angled time slice (due to the transformation) but still uses the same chart? So their time slices are stretched rectangles compared to the god-like observer?

Or do lorentz transformations change things so much that it would be impossible to represent the universe using a single 4d block (i.e. you'd need a different 4d block for each observer)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Lorentz transformations account for time dilation AND length contraction, so not only is the time axis different according to observers in different inertial reference frames, but the spatial axes also changes. Perhaps this video might be helpful for helping you visualize:



So I think It's more of the latter suggestion, it's not just the time axis that is stretched relative to an outside "god-like" observer, but in fact, the entire space that is distorted.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks that is a good video.

I guess my question is about the way a time slice deforms in the 'worst case'. For the 3d space-time example it would appear the time slices get transformed from a regular rectangle into a less regular rectangle. But would the rectangle have any curves in it or would it stay 'flat'?

For example could you always represent an observer's transformation as parabola or can it get more complex than that (for a 1d space, 1d time example)? When I look at the lorentz transformation formula (with a very untrained eye):

78195e8f63116bf11b2bbef574fbcc25.png


It seems simple enough that it wouldn't 'warp' the time slice in a very complex way. I just wonder what the limit of that warping is.
 
You're right, the warping is really not that complex. It's linear, in fact.
 
It is the same space and the same metric, just different basis vectors for different observers.
 
In an inertial frame of reference (IFR), there are two fixed points, A and B, which share an entangled state $$ \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|0>_A|1>_B+|1>_A|0>_B) $$ At point A, a measurement is made. The state then collapses to $$ |a>_A|b>_B, \{a,b\}=\{0,1\} $$ We assume that A has the state ##|a>_A## and B has ##|b>_B## simultaneously, i.e., when their synchronized clocks both read time T However, in other inertial frames, due to the relativity of simultaneity, the moment when B has ##|b>_B##...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
5K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K