Lorentz Transformations For Particle In Uniform Electromagnetic Field

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the Lorentz transformations for a charged particle in a uniform electromagnetic field, specifically when transitioning from frame S to frame S'. The electric field is represented as \underline{E} = E_0 \hat{z} and the magnetic field as \underline{B} = B_0 \hat{x}. The particle's trajectory in frame S' is circular with radius R = mγ²v / (qB₀), where v is determined by the relation v = E₀/B₀. The final equations describing the particle's motion in frame S' are provided as x' = 0, y' = -R Sin(ωt'), and z' = R(1 - Cos(ωt')).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lorentz transformations in special relativity
  • Familiarity with electromagnetic field equations
  • Knowledge of the Lorentz force law
  • Basic concepts of circular motion in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Lorentz transformations for electric and magnetic fields
  • Explore the implications of the Lorentz force in different reference frames
  • Investigate the relationship between electric and magnetic fields in moving frames
  • Learn about the dynamics of charged particles in uniform electromagnetic fields
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of electromagnetism, and anyone studying the effects of special relativity on charged particles in electromagnetic fields.

yusohard
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A charge q is released from rest at the origin, in the presence of a uniform electric
field and a uniform magnetic field \underline{E} = E_0 \hat{z} and \underline{B} = B_0 \hat{x} in frame S.
In another frame S', moving with velocity along the y-axis with respect to S, the electric field is zero.
What must be the velocity v and the magnetic field in the frame S' ?

Show that the particle moves in S' in a circle of radius R=m\gamma^2 v / (q B_0) What are the equations in x', y', z, t' which describe the trajectory of the particle in the moving frame S' ?

By transforming from frame S’ show that the path of the particle in the original frame S is:
\gamma^2 (y-vt)^2 + (z-R)^2 = R^2

Homework Equations



Transformations of electric and magnetic fields for boosts in y-direction:

E'_x = \gamma (E_x + \beta c B_z)
E'_y = E_y
E'_z = \gamma (E_z - \beta c B_x)
B'_x = \gamma (B_x - (\beta / c) E_z )
B'_y = B_y
B'_z = \gamma (B_z + (\beta / c) E_x )

Lorentz Force:

\underline{F} = m \gamma \frac{d v}{d x} = m \gamma \frac{v^2}{R} = q \underline{B} \times \underline{v}

The Attempt at a Solution



Only the E field in the z-axis exists and, as stated in the problem, is zero:

E'_z = \gamma (E_0 - \beta c B_0) = 0 \rightarrow v=E_0/B_0

And similarly only the B field in the x-axis has a solution, and using the equation for v above:

B'_x = \gamma (B_0 - (\beta / c) E_0 ) = \gamma B_0 (1 - E^2_0/c^2 B^2_0 ) = B_0 / \gamma

Using the Lorentz force equation above:

m \gamma \frac{v^2}{R} = q B_0/\gamma \rightarrow R=m\gamma^2 v / (q B_0)

Now i doubt how to write equations in x', y', z, t' which describe the trajectory of the particle in the moving frame S'.

I think it should be:

(y'^2 + z'^2) = R^2

As it is in the yz-plane(right?)

If i transform back with y' = \gamma (y - vt) and z'=z I just get:

\gamma^2 (y - vt)^2 + z^2 = R^2

Missing the (z-R)^2 term.

Can anyone see where I've gone wrong or what I've missing?

Any help appreciated. Been driving me crazy.

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Solved it.

For those interested:

It is indeed going in a circle in the zy-plane in S'. Since it starts at the origin in S' and goes clockwise, the equations of motion in terms of x', y', z' ,t' are:

x'=0
y'=-R Sin(\omega t')
z'=R(1-Cos(\omega t'))
Where \omega = v/R

Transform via usual lorentz transforms for boosts in y-axis:

t'=\gamma (t - \frac{v}{c^2} y)
y=\gamma (y' + v t')

Subbing in for the primed parameters in and following through etc,etc,etc,etc,etc,etc:

y= vt - \frac{R}{\gamma} Sin(\omega \gamma (t - \frac{v}{c^2}y))
z= R(1- \gamma R Cos(\omega \gamma (t - \frac{v}{c^2}y))

Using your favourite trig formula (no prizes for that one), we can see indeed:

\gamma^2(y-vt)^2 + (z-R)^2 = R^2

As required. I'll sleep easy tonight eh.
 

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K