Lorentzian 2-Manifold Local Conformal Flatness: Explained

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Infrared
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lorentzian
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Any Lorentzian 2-manifold (M, gab) is locally conformally flat, meaning for any point p in M, there exists a neighborhood U of p that is conformally flat. The proof relies on the existence of harmonic coordinates, which can be established through the Poincaré Lemma. Specifically, if the 1-form ωa = εabbα is shown to be closed, then a scalar field β exists such that ∇aβ = ωa, confirming the local conformal flatness of the manifold. This conclusion is supported by the properties of the Lorentzian metric and the harmonic nature of the scalar fields involved.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lorentzian geometry and metrics
  • Familiarity with harmonic functions and their properties
  • Knowledge of differential forms and the Poincaré Lemma
  • Basic concepts of smooth manifolds and coordinate transformations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Poincaré Lemma in detail to understand its implications in differential geometry
  • Explore harmonic coordinates and their applications in manifold theory
  • Investigate the properties of Lorentzian metrics and their role in general relativity
  • Learn about conformal transformations and their significance in geometry
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and students specializing in differential geometry, general relativity, or theoretical physics who seek to deepen their understanding of the properties of Lorentzian manifolds and their conformal structures.

Infrared
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
1,084
Reaction score
658
I have seen it stated that any Lorentzian 2-manifold is locally conformally flat; in what sense is it local? Is there a way to show this explicitly?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As you will see shortly, the fact that a Lorentzian 2-manifold ##(M,g_{ab})## is locally conformally flat means that for any ##p\in M##, there exists a neighborhood ##U## of ##p## (in the natural topology generated by the smooth structure) such that ##U## is conformally flat in the usual sense. The key part is the local existence of harmonic coordinates. In general the local existence can be guaranteed by theorems regarding specific types of PDEs but for 2-manifolds there is an easy way to prove local existence that is explicit, more instructive, and somewhat more minimal.

Let ##M## be a smooth 2-manifold, ##g_{ab}## a Lorentzian metric on ##M##, and ##\nabla_{a}## the derivative operator associated with ##g_{ab}##. Consider a scalar field ##\alpha## on ##M## that is harmonic meaning it satisfies ##\nabla^{a}\nabla_{a}\alpha = 0 ## and let ##\epsilon_{ab}## be the natural volume element on ##M## (i.e. it satisfies ##\epsilon_{ab}\epsilon^{ab} = -2##). It is easy to show that the so defined natural volume element then satisfies ##\epsilon_{ij}\epsilon^{ab} = -2\delta^{[a}_{i}\delta^{b]}_{j}##. Now consider another scalar field ##\beta## given by the equation ##\nabla_{a}\beta = \epsilon_{ab}\nabla^{b}\alpha##.

We must show that given the 1-form ##\omega_{a} = \epsilon_{ab}\nabla^{b}\alpha##, there always exists locally (in the above sense) a scalar field ##\beta## such that ##\nabla_{a}\beta = \omega_{a}##. If we can show that ##\omega_{a}## is closed, meaning ##\nabla_{[a}\omega_{b]} = 0##, then the Poincare Lemma guarantees that locally ##\omega_{a}## is exact, that is locally there exists a scalar field ##\beta## such that ##\nabla_{a}\beta = \omega_{a}##, as desired.

Note that if we can show ##\epsilon^{ab}\nabla_{a}\omega_{b} = 0## then we are done since this would imply ##\epsilon_{ij}\epsilon^{ab}\nabla_{a}\omega_{b} = \nabla_{[i}\omega_{j]} = 0##. Also note that since ##\epsilon_{ab}\epsilon^{ab} = -2##, we have that ##\epsilon^{ab}\nabla_{c}\epsilon_{ab} = 0## implying ##\epsilon_{ij}\epsilon^{ab}\nabla_{c}\epsilon_{ab} = \nabla_{c}\epsilon_{ij} = 0## identically. Proceeding with this, we have ##\epsilon^{ab}\nabla_{a}\omega_{b} = \epsilon^{ab}\nabla_{a}(\epsilon_{bc}\nabla^{c}\alpha) = \nabla_{a}(\epsilon^{ab}\epsilon_{bc}\nabla^{c}\alpha)## and this reduces to ##\epsilon^{ab}\nabla_{a}\omega_{b} = \nabla_{a}(\delta_{c}^{a}\nabla^{c}\alpha) = \nabla_{a}\nabla^{a}\alpha = 0 ## hence ##\nabla_{[a}\omega_{b]} = 0## as desired so locally there always exists a ##\beta## such that ##\nabla_{a}\beta = \epsilon_{ab}\nabla^{b}\alpha##.

Note that ##\nabla^{a}\nabla_{a}\beta = \epsilon_{ab}\nabla^{a}\nabla^{b}\alpha = 0## thus ##\beta## itself is harmonic. We wish now to make a coordinate transformation to the coordinates ##(\alpha,\beta)##; these coordinates are called harmonic coordinates as all the coordinate functions are harmonic. Say our metric was originally expressed in some coordinates ##(x^1,x^2)## as ##ds^{2} = g_{\mu\nu}dx^{\mu}dx^{\nu},\mu,\nu\in \{1,2\}##. We know that ##g^{\mu'\nu'} = \nabla_{\mu}x^{\mu'}\nabla_{\nu}x^{\nu'}g^{\mu\nu} = \nabla_{\mu}x^{\mu'}\nabla^{\mu}x^{\nu'}## hence ##g^{\alpha\beta} = \nabla^{\mu}\alpha\nabla_{\mu}\beta = \epsilon_{\mu\gamma}\nabla^{\mu}\alpha\nabla^{\gamma}\alpha = 0## and
##g^{\beta\beta} = \nabla_{\mu}\beta\nabla^{\mu}\beta = \epsilon_{\mu\gamma}\epsilon^{\mu\lambda}\nabla^{\gamma}\alpha \nabla_{\lambda}\alpha = -g^{\alpha\alpha} = -\Omega^{-2}## where ##\Omega^{-2} = \nabla^{a}\alpha \nabla_{a}\alpha##. Now ##(g^{\mu'\nu'}) = \text{diag}(\Omega^{-2},-\Omega^{-2})## so ##(g_{\mu'\nu'}) = \text{diag}(\Omega^{2},-\Omega^{2})## i.e. ##ds^{2} = \Omega^{2}\{-d\beta^{2} + d\alpha^{2}\}##. Thus every Lorentzian 2-manifold is locally conformally flat.
 
There is a much simpler argument that any 2-manifold (Lorentzian or Riemannian) is locally conformally flat. The metric is a 2x2 symmetric matrix, which therefore has three independent entries. But coordinate transformations allow you two arbitrary functions of gauge symmetry. Therefore you can always choose a gauge in which the metric has one degree of freedom: the conformal factor.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K