Lose weight (mass) or train? - effect of losing weight (mass) on power

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the impact of weight loss versus power training on cycling performance. A 75 kg rider producing 250 W of power can achieve an effective power output of approximately 268 W by losing 5 kg of body mass, demonstrating that weight reduction can enhance power-to-weight ratio. The analysis indicates that a decrease in mass reduces resistive forces, particularly in scenarios involving inclines and acceleration, thereby improving overall cycling efficiency. The lecturer emphasizes the importance of considering the trade-offs between weight loss and power training for optimal performance.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of power-to-weight ratio in cycling
  • Basic knowledge of physics related to force and motion
  • Familiarity with concepts of gravitational potential energy
  • Experience with cycling dynamics and resistive forces
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the physics of cycling efficiency and power output
  • Explore training techniques for improving power in cyclists
  • Learn about the effects of body composition on athletic performance
  • Investigate strategies for weight management in endurance sports
USEFUL FOR

Cyclists, sports scientists, coaches, and fitness enthusiasts interested in optimizing performance through weight management and power training strategies.

Byrne
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Lose weight (mass) or train? -- effect of losing weight (mass) on power

I'm having troubles wrapping my head around this one (I've provided the example from my class notes below):

Q: Is it better to lose 5 kg of body mass (assume no change in muscle strength) or to train harder and gain 15 W of power?

Given:
75 kg rider producing 250 W of power

ANSWER:

75 kg / 70 kg = 1.071
In terms of Watts: 250 W x 1.071 = 268 W, ~ 18 W increase

So, depending on the initial weight, the athlete might see as large a benefit from losing weight as training harder.

My question -- how does a decrease in the mass of the rider increase his power producing ability by 18 W? Intuitively, I would think that a rider with lower mass will experience less resistive forces when riding (i.e., gravity when on an incline, kinetic friction) and so can sustain the same velocity as a heavier rider without applying as much force and, therefore, less power.

From a physics standpoint, how does a mass decrease result in an increase in Power as this example suggests (taken from my class notes)?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org


If it was strictly moving at constant velocity and his air resistance profile doesn't change, it might not.

But when you take into account changes of height - like a hill - where effort is going into increasing gravitational potential, then he would benefit from the lower mass, as that would be less work. Or any starts and stops where he would be accelerating.

The lecturer was merely trying to get you to think about the consequences of getting heavier. The harder training and weight gain would need to develop an additional amount of power to be worth it I think is the point.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
27K