The forum discussion centers on the television show "Lost," particularly its concluding seasons and the audience's mixed reactions to its narrative complexity and scientific themes. Participants express a range of opinions, from initial excitement to disappointment with the show's direction, especially regarding the potential for a "Deus ex machina" ending. Many viewers appreciate the intricate plotting but criticize the pacing and coherence in later seasons. The conversation highlights the show's unique blend of drama and science fiction, which has captivated a dedicated fanbase despite its flaws.
PREREQUISITESFans of "Lost," television critics, writers, and anyone interested in the evolution of narrative techniques in serialized storytelling.
Glennage said:Please show me the answers.
Galteeth said:I understand your general point, but there were specific plot points you mentioned that were in fact answered. If this was not a rhetorical question, I could list the answers to some of the questions you posed (maybe I just have a good memory for stupid plot details?) Do you want me to do that?
magpies said:So why was this show so popular again? I tryed watching a few episodes and each time I was like this is the worst version of survivor ever. It was just blah imo.
It was thought provoking for many.magpies said:So why was this show so popular again?
Having never watched even a single episode of "Survivor", I can't really comment on that.I tryed watching a few episodes and each time I was like this is the worst version of survivor ever.