Low Entropy big bang , models that explain it

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the low entropy configuration of the universe at the Big Bang, exploring various models such as the multiverse theory proposed by Caroll and Chen, the cyclic universe model (CCC) by Penrose, and the hybrid approach of Baum and Frampton. Participants argue that the dense state of the universe does not adequately explain low entropy, as the number of allowed configurations is not necessarily reduced by compression. The conversation highlights that the early universe and the current universe are two states of the same system, emphasizing the importance of considering both states in entropy discussions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Caroll/Chen multiverse model
  • Familiarity with Penrose's CCC model
  • Knowledge of Baum and Frampton's hybrid model
  • Concept of entropy in cosmology
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of the Weyl curvature hypothesis in cosmology
  • Examine the evidence against the CCC model and its predictions
  • Explore the relationship between entropy density and universe evolution
  • Investigate alternative theories explaining low entropy at the Big Bang
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, cosmologists, and theoretical physicists interested in understanding the origins of the universe and the implications of entropy in cosmological models.

skydivephil
Messages
470
Reaction score
9
Hi
As I understand it there are several attmepts to explain the low entropy configuration of the universe at the big bang.
Is seems to me the choices on the table that I am aware of are a mutliverse as in the Caroll/Chen model . A cyclic universe as in the CCC model or some hybrid of the two as in the Baum/Frmapton model.
Are there any other explanations to this and if so how do they work?

Also why does the dense state of the unvierse not work as an explanation? After all I would have thought if the unvierse is so incredibly compressed then the number of allowed configurations should be less, obviously this is not the case , but why not ?
 
Space news on Phys.org
I wouldn't say that CCC attempts to explain the low-entropy big bang. Penrose takes the Weyl curvature hypothesis as an assumption. That means assuming the low-entropy big bang, not explaining it. I also don't think CCC is viable at this point. It predicted nonstandard particle physics, which turned out to be incompatible with observation. (The CMB evidence also turned out to be completely bogus.)
 
skydivephil said:
Also why does the dense state of the unvierse not work as an explanation? After all I would have thought if the unvierse is so incredibly compressed then the number of allowed configurations should be less, obviously this is not the case , but why not ?
Bear in mind that our current universe and the early universe are just two different states of the same system. So if you want to examine the entropy of the situation, you have to consider our current state to be just as relevant a configuration of the system as its early state. The total number of configurations available is not limited by the small size of the early system, because it is possible for such a small system to evolve into a large one like the one we observe.

However, it naively seems like the small size of the early universe must have something to do with the answer, whatever that answer happens to be. Carol and Chen proposed an explanation where a small piece of a large universe which has high entropy but very low entropy density could start off a new universe: it isn't a huge drop in entropy because of the low entropy density of the "parent" universe.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 56 ·
2
Replies
56
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 80 ·
3
Replies
80
Views
12K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K