I Lower center of mass creates more stability so how do you explain moving the center of mass upwards increases stability?

AI Thread Summary
In martial arts, raising the arms during movements like kicking shifts the center of mass (COM) upwards, which might seem counterintuitive for stability. However, this action increases the moment of inertia, allowing for better balance control. Maintaining balance relies on adjusting the center of gravity (COG), which is facilitated by arm movement. While a higher COM can reduce stability, it can also lengthen the natural period of oscillation, making movements smoother. Ultimately, the interplay between balance and COG adjustment is crucial for effective performance in martial arts.
John3022
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
How is it possible that moving the center of mass upwards increases stability and not the opposite?
When you are doing certain movements in martial arts like kicking, you bring your arms up in order to balance yourself. Bringing your arms upwards also moves the center of mass (COM) upwards but if the COM is higher than the position should be less stable and not more stable. How do you explain the stabilizing effect of moving your COM upwards?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are increasing your moment of inertia.
 
John3022 said:
How do you explain the stabilizing effect of moving your COM upwards?
Have you ever seen a wire walker (e.g. the Great Wallenda) stroll across a wire with his arms down by his side? BALANCE matters more than COG.

EDIT: Hm ... that was not well put. Yes, balance is what's important, BUT ... you maintain balance by changing you COG, which you cannot do if your arms are by your sides. You have to be able to move your arms around to maintain your COG where it needs to be for you to not fall over.
 
Last edited:
John3022 said:
When you are doing certain movements in martial arts like kicking, you bring your arms up in order to balance yourself.
Could you show us a specific movement?
How high are the arms brought up (shoulder level or way above)?
 
John3022 said:
How do you explain the stabilizing effect of moving your COM upwards?
Moment of inertia.
For a small boat, raising the centre of mass, lengthens the natural period of oscillation, and so makes it more comfortable, but reduces stability.

Longer pendulums swing slower.
 
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
Back
Top