Lower Indices Tensor in Special Relativity: What to Know?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Palindrom
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Tensor
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of tensors in the context of special relativity, specifically focusing on the relationship between tensors with upper indices and their corresponding tensors with lower indices. The original poster queries about the transformation of an antisymmetric tensor from upper to lower indices.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the method of lowering indices through contraction with the metric tensor. There is a question raised about the definition of contraction itself, indicating a need for further clarification on this concept.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights into the relationship between upper and lower index tensors. Some guidance on the use of the metric tensor for index lowering has been mentioned, but there is no explicit consensus on the definitions or methods being discussed.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference external resources for further reading, indicating that there may be varying levels of familiarity with the concepts involved. The discussion appears to be constrained by the need for a clearer understanding of tensor operations and the specific properties of the metric tensor in this context.

Palindrom
Messages
263
Reaction score
0
Given a tensor with upper indices in special relativity, what do I know of the corresponding tensor with lower indices? Why?
For example, for the antisymmetric tensor $\varepsilon ^{iklm} $<br />, what is $\varepsilon _{iklm} $<br />?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How do you always find the lowered components given the upper components? The answer is contraction with the metric.
 
So now we're down to this question: What is contraction?

(thanks by the way)
 
Well the relationship is that e^iklm are the commpoents of a (4,0) tensor and e_iklm are the components of it's dual. Clearly then there's a metric function (in this case a (4,4) tensor) that maps the first tensor to it's dual and unsuprisingly this metric is related to the metric on the space of (1,0) tensors.

All you need to do is use 'inner multiplication' the metric tensor and it's dual.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
718
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K