Lowest frequency of a transformer

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Crazymechanic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Frequency Transformer
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The lowest frequency at which a transformer can operate effectively is theoretically zero, but this is impractical in real-world applications. Transformers rely on induction, requiring a change in voltage amplitude and periodic polarity reversal to induce current in the secondary winding. The rate of change in voltage or current is crucial; if the frequency is too low, the transformer may not function efficiently due to core saturation. Optimal performance parameters must be carefully selected within the domain of electrical engineering.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of transformer operation and induction principles
  • Knowledge of AC and DC voltage characteristics
  • Familiarity with core saturation effects in transformers
  • Basic concepts of electrical engineering and circuit design
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the effects of frequency on transformer efficiency
  • Study core materials and their saturation points in transformers
  • Learn about the ideal transformer model and its limitations
  • Explore practical applications of transformers in low-frequency scenarios
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineers, students of electrical engineering, and professionals involved in transformer design and optimization will benefit from this discussion.

Crazymechanic
Messages
831
Reaction score
12
Hi , I've been wondering about this one thing.
Well a transformer works on indcution , so a increase/decrease in voltage amplitude and/or periodical polarity reversal is needed to induce a current and voltage in the secondary.

Now if we leave the current reversal aside for a bit and look at the increase then highest point and then decrease of a waveform that " feeds" the transformer primary , I wonder what's the lowest frequency a transformer can still be able to work ?
The bigger the wavelength the longer it takes for the voltage to reach and then drop drom a certain level in one half period, but since we can also say that AC is just DC if looked at from a " point in time" perspective then since the time it takes for a very low frequency half wave to change is pretty long does the transformer secondary can still sense that?

Or maybe I should ask , what is the lowest rate of change in voltage/current that a transformer can still work with ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Crazymechanic said:
Or maybe I should ask , what is the lowest rate of change in voltage/current that a transformer can still work with ?

What are the size limits of the transformer for the working frequency, house size, planet size or known universe size?
http://www.atltransformers.co.uk/pages/frequency.htm
http://www.electronics-tutorials.ws/transformer/transformer-basics.html
 
Last edited:
there are no limits of size , this is a theoretical question , I'm theoretically interested.

So if i get it right from the article you gave me , a transformer could work on dc if only for one thing , after a given amount of time , or the time it took for a given material and size transformer core to reach saturation , so if the core won't saturate then the transformer could transfer usable power , but I guess it's just late nad I got something wrong because a static magnetic field can't induce current can it ..?
 
Theoretically, the minimal frequency of transformation is zero. Which is, of course, nonsensical in practice.

Practically, it is one the many parameters of a transformer that must be very carefully chosen for optimal performance. It is in the domain of electrical engineering, not theoretical physics.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K