Luminous intensity in different directions

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of luminous intensity in relation to the angle of incidence of sunlight on a surface. Participants are exploring how the intensity of sunlight varies based on the orientation of the surface relative to the rays of light.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning the assumption that luminous intensity remains constant regardless of the angle of incidence. Some are exploring the implications of this assumption on energy distribution across surfaces of varying orientations.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants offering differing viewpoints on the relationship between luminous intensity and angle. Some have suggested reconsidering the definitions and implications of luminous intensity versus illuminance, while others are questioning the original poster's reasoning.

Contextual Notes

There appears to be a lack of consensus on the definitions and relationships between luminous intensity, illuminance, and the effects of distance and angle on these quantities. Participants are navigating through these concepts without a clear resolution.

Amith2006
Messages
416
Reaction score
2
# The intensity of direct sunlight on a surface normal to the rays is Io. What is the intensity of direct sunlight on a surface whose normal makes an angle of 60 degrees with the rays of the sun?
I think the answer is Io itself because for an isotropic point source of light the luminous intensity is the same in all directions. Is it correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I may be barking up the wrong tree, so correct me someone if I'm wrong but...

By your reasoning, if the angle of normal to the surface tended towards zero, then if the intensity at all points were Io then the total energy across the surface would tend to infinity (for an infinite surface).

The intensity must decrease with distance.

EaGG
 
Why wouldn't it be cos(60)?
 
I think lamberts inverse square law is true only for illuminance and not for luminous intensity.
Illuminance = [(luminous intensity) x (cos(theta))]/R^2
Luminous intensity = (Luminous flux)/(Solid angle)
Luminous intensity is equal to the Luminous flux for unit solid angle. By definition of Luminous Flux, it is the energy of the visible part of the radiation emitted,transmitted or received per second. As the solid angle is increased, the total flux goes on increasing and reaches a maximum value at 4(pi) steradians. So I think in a particular direction the luminous intensity is constant irrespective of the distance. I may be wrong.
 
hmmmm...

The question as you typed it asks for the intensity falling on a surface rather than for a given solid angle. The intensity - a measure of the power received per unit area must change with angle.

EaGG
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K