MHB -m99.53 ty-plane hypotheses of Theorem 2.4.2.

  • Thread starter Thread starter karush
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theorem
karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
View attachment 9090
State where in the ty-plane the hypotheses of Theorem 2.4.2 are satisfied

$\displaystyle y^\prime= \frac{t-y}{2t+5y}$
ok I don't see how this book answer was derived since not sure how to separate varibles
$2t+5y>0 \textit{ or }2t+5y<0$
 

Attachments

  • 2_4_2.png
    2_4_2.png
    16 KB · Views: 117
Physics news on Phys.org
This is very concerning. You have posted a series of question where you seem to have no idea what the question is asking. In each one you have immediately jumped to trying to solve the differential equation when the question given does not ask you to do so.

Here the problem just asks you to "State where in the ty-plane the hypotheses of theorem 2.4.2 are satisfied". The hypotheses of theorem 2.4.2 are that the function f(t,y) in the differential equation y'= f(t,y) be continuous. Here the differential equation is $y'= \frac{t- y}{2t+ 5y}$. So the problem is asking "where is $
\frac{t- y}{2t+ 5y}$ continuous?"

You should know that a rational function, such as this, is continuous as long as the denominator is not 0. So we want to find (t, y) such that $2t+ 5y\ne 0$. The simplest way to do that is to say where it is 0! 2t+ 5y= 0 is a straight line in the ty-plane. That is equivalent to the line y= -(2/5)t, a line through the origin with slope -2/5. The hypotheses of theorem 2.4.2 are satisfied every where EXCEPT on that line.
 
Thread 'Determine whether ##125## is a unit in ##\mathbb{Z_471}##'
This is the question, I understand the concept, in ##\mathbb{Z_n}## an element is a is a unit if and only if gcd( a,n) =1. My understanding of backwards substitution, ... i have using Euclidean algorithm, ##471 = 3⋅121 + 108## ##121 = 1⋅108 + 13## ##108 =8⋅13+4## ##13=3⋅4+1## ##4=4⋅1+0## using back-substitution, ##1=13-3⋅4## ##=(121-1⋅108)-3(108-8⋅13)## ... ##= 121-(471-3⋅121)-3⋅471+9⋅121+24⋅121-24(471-3⋅121## ##=121-471+3⋅121-3⋅471+9⋅121+24⋅121-24⋅471+72⋅121##...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...

Similar threads

Back
Top