Mac vs PC: Debunking the Myths and Examining the Facts

  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Jeans
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mac pc
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion critically examines the ongoing debate between Macs and PCs, highlighting specific hardware comparisons. The new Mac Pro features a maximum processor speed of 3.2 GHz, while the Dell XPS 730 offers a factory overclocked 3.8 GHz processor. Additionally, the HP Pavilion HDX16t boasts a 2.8 GHz processor, surpassing Apple's 2.6 GHz laptops. The conversation emphasizes that performance is not solely dependent on hardware specifications but also on the efficiency of the code and the synergy between the operating system and hardware.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of processor specifications, including GHz ratings
  • Familiarity with operating systems, particularly macOS and Windows
  • Knowledge of hardware compatibility and flexibility in PCs
  • Basic coding principles and how they affect computational efficiency
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the performance differences between macOS and Windows in various applications
  • Explore the impact of code efficiency on hardware performance
  • Investigate the advantages of overclocking in PC hardware
  • Learn about the hardware-software integration in Macs versus PCs
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for hardware enthusiasts, software developers, and IT professionals looking to understand the comparative advantages of Macs and PCs in terms of performance and usability.

Math Jeans
Messages
347
Reaction score
0
I've been hearing numerous claims that Macs are hands down better than PCs. People say that Windows even runs faster on a Mac

Discounting the OS (which can be switched around freely), I have found different information.

The Mac website has the new Mac Pro desktop that they state on the website to have a maximum of a 3.2 GHz processor.
However, I went to the Dell website and found an XPS 730 sporting a Factory O/C'd 3.8 GHz processor.

Apple also brags about their 2.6 GHz laptops, but the HP Pavilion HDX16t laptop has a blazing 2.8 GHz processor.


I fail to see all of this hype about Macs!
 
Computer science news on Phys.org
It's not all about brute power. It's about how elegant your code is to use the available power. If I have an inefficient code that wastes computational speed, it's going to run slower despite having a faster processor.
 
Are you referring to the OS or the computers themselves?
 
Most of hardware in MACs is specifically designed for the MAC OS. In contrast, a PC is more flexible, meaning it can run various OSs on any hardware imaginable, but at an expense of overall robustness that comes from the interaction of the OS and the hardware. In practice, both topologies have advantages and disadvantages in different applications.
 
Last edited:
You even quote and overclocked speed! what the hell...

Doesn't matter about the specs...matters which one will do what better, faster, and easier.
 

Similar threads

Windows vs Mac for Engineering?
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
90K
Searching for Answers on Processor Performance & Real-Time Processing
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K