Mag. 8 & 7 Earthquakes - Mexico 08/09/2017 & 19/09/2017

  • Thread starter Thread starter StevieTNZ
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The thread discusses two significant earthquakes that struck Mexico in September 2017, specifically focusing on the magnitude 8.1 earthquake on September 8 and the magnitude 7.1 earthquake on September 19. Participants share real-time updates, observations from seismographs, and explore the implications of tsunami warnings and the nature of seismic activity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • Initial reports indicated a magnitude 8 earthquake, which was later upgraded to 8.1 by the USGS, although some participants mentioned an 8.2 magnitude from other sources.
  • Participants noted discrepancies in media reports regarding the earthquake's magnitude and expressed skepticism about the accuracy of these reports.
  • There were discussions about the tsunami warning for New Zealand, with some participants questioning the potential for waves to travel such a distance and referencing tidal gauge data.
  • One participant suggested that the lights seen in the sky after the earthquake could be attributed to electrical system failures rather than a mysterious phenomenon.
  • Discussion included a historical context, with references to a previous significant earthquake in 1985 that caused extensive damage and loss of life in Mexico City.
  • Participants shared observations from their seismographs, noting differences in amplitude between the two earthquakes.
  • There was mention of a lack of significant aftershocks following the 7.1 earthquake, with links to articles discussing this phenomenon.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints regarding the magnitude of the earthquakes and the implications of the tsunami warnings. There is no consensus on the exact magnitude reported by different sources, and discussions about the nature of the seismic activity and its effects remain unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Some participants noted the importance of relying on official sources for earthquake data, highlighting the potential for media inaccuracies. The discussion also reflects uncertainty regarding the relationship between seismic activity and observed phenomena such as the lights in the sky.

StevieTNZ
Messages
1,944
Reaction score
837
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
StevieTNZ said:
I see this as breaking news: https://www.stuff.co.nz/world/americas/96665395/strong-earthquake-hits-off-coast-of-mexico
Everything is fluid at the moment, so updates and revisions will be forthcoming. A tsunami threat for NZ is being assessed.
ya just beat me to it

was about to post

M 8.0 - 96km SW of Pijijiapan, Mexico

Time: 2017-09-08 04:49:17 (UTC)
Location: 15.029°N 93.807°W
Depth: 35.0 km

upload_2017-9-8_15-38-58.png
tis still coming in on my seismo ...

http://www.sydneystormcity.com/seismograms.htm
 
Upgraded to 8.2 now. Also, there was something about a 6.1mag earthquake in the northern pacific island?
 
StevieTNZ said:
Upgraded to 8.2 now. Also, there was something about a 6.1mag earthquake in the northern pacific island?

where did you get the 8.2 from ?

USGS are saying 8.1

M 8.1 - 87km SW of Pijijiapan, MexicoI'm surprised that it is even a M8 considering how small the amplitude on my seismograph is
Dave
 
davenn said:
ahhh OK ... always pays to go to the source
all media outlets are notoriously bad with their reporting :rolleyes:
Yahoo is determined to be the most inaccurate. One of their RSS feeds was saying that it was 8.4.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn
4 hours later and there is still low level signal coming in on my seismo
 
  • #10
To me it looks like an ordinary lightning storm in summer. More interesting is the tsunami warning. Could it really travel thus far?
 
  • #11
fresh_42 said:
More interesting is the tsunami warning. Could it really travel thus far?
In fact I've just seen this: "Tidal gauges are providing evidence of the first waves arriving at Chatham Islands and East Cape, consistent with GNS Science predictions."
But they are small waves, and no evacuation orders have been given.
 
  • #12
StevieTNZ said:
In fact I've just seen this: "Tidal gauges are providing evidence of the first waves arriving at Chatham Islands and East Cape, consistent with GNS Science predictions."
But they are small waves, and no evacuation orders have been given.
Although there are no major barriers on the surface between Mexico and NZ, I would think that the Marianne trench would play a major role for deep sea waves, i.e. I'd expected them to dive there and get scattered. But I've never had a course on fluid dynamics, so this might be wrong. Could be an interesting thread.
 
  • #13
StevieTNZ said:
In the video on the 2nd link, does anyone know what causes the sky to light up as it did after the quake? Is that activity correlated with quakes?

fresh_42 said:
To me it looks like an ordinary lightning storm in summer.

if you look closely, you will see the flashes are originating on the ground and then lighting up the clouds above

Simple and easy explanation ... arcing of electrical systems and explosions of transformers etc in substations
as the power lines are swinging all over place and contacting each other
fresh_42 said:
More interesting is the tsunami warning. Could it really travel thus far?

tsunamis regularly cross the Pacific Ocean with ease :smile:

fresh_42 said:
Although there are no major barriers on the surface between Mexico and NZ, I would think that the Marianne trench would play a major role for deep sea waves,
I assume you mean the Mariana Trench

It won't affect how the tsunami arrives in NZDave
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1oldman2 and fresh_42
  • #14
raw and processed seismograms from my recorder

170908  UT M8.0 offshr Mexico zhi.GIF


170908.045502.zhi.gif.gif
Dave
 
  • #15
A classic example of a unilateral rupture ( rupture on the fault starts in one place and goes in one direction only)

upload_2017-9-11_13-39-45.png
also been noting in the media that they are all saying that this is the largest Mexican quake in 100 years
They all seem to be forgetting about the M8.0/8.1 in 1985 that devastated Mexico City that killed more than 5000 people
and did horrific damage

many references on the www
https://www.bing.com/search?q=1985+...&src=IE-SearchBox&FORM=IENTTR&conversationid=Dave
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: fresh_42
  • #16
Great information, everyone.
 
  • #17
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn
  • #19
StevieTNZ said:
I'll let Dave post any graphs his instruments have picked up, to start a new thread.

we will keep it in here since the thread title accounts for it

M 7.1 - 5km ENE of Raboso, Mexico

Time: 2017-09-19 18:14:39 (UTC)
Location: 18.584°N 98.399°W
Depth: 51.0 km

a raw seismogram of the M7.1 from my recorder... I haven't had a chance to process it yet
note the much smaller amplitude compared to the M8.1 up the thread post#14

zhi.gif
only 120km SSE of downtown Mexico City

mexico quake.jpg
Dave
 
  • #21
Updated aftershock zone for the M8.1

Events M4.5 and greater for the 8th Sept to 24th Sept

still clearly showing a unilateral rupture in the nor-westerly direction

8.1 mexico and 6.1 ashk.jpg


cheers
Dave
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K