Discussion Overview
The thread discusses two significant earthquakes that struck Mexico in September 2017, specifically focusing on the magnitude 8.1 earthquake on September 8 and the magnitude 7.1 earthquake on September 19. Participants share real-time updates, observations from seismographs, and explore the implications of tsunami warnings and the nature of seismic activity.
Discussion Character
- Exploratory
- Technical explanation
- Debate/contested
- Experimental/applied
Main Points Raised
- Initial reports indicated a magnitude 8 earthquake, which was later upgraded to 8.1 by the USGS, although some participants mentioned an 8.2 magnitude from other sources.
- Participants noted discrepancies in media reports regarding the earthquake's magnitude and expressed skepticism about the accuracy of these reports.
- There were discussions about the tsunami warning for New Zealand, with some participants questioning the potential for waves to travel such a distance and referencing tidal gauge data.
- One participant suggested that the lights seen in the sky after the earthquake could be attributed to electrical system failures rather than a mysterious phenomenon.
- Discussion included a historical context, with references to a previous significant earthquake in 1985 that caused extensive damage and loss of life in Mexico City.
- Participants shared observations from their seismographs, noting differences in amplitude between the two earthquakes.
- There was mention of a lack of significant aftershocks following the 7.1 earthquake, with links to articles discussing this phenomenon.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants express various viewpoints regarding the magnitude of the earthquakes and the implications of the tsunami warnings. There is no consensus on the exact magnitude reported by different sources, and discussions about the nature of the seismic activity and its effects remain unresolved.
Contextual Notes
Some participants noted the importance of relying on official sources for earthquake data, highlighting the potential for media inaccuracies. The discussion also reflects uncertainty regarding the relationship between seismic activity and observed phenomena such as the lights in the sky.