Magnetic energy stored in a cylindrical conductor

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the magnetic energy stored in an infinite cylindrical conductor with radius 'a' carrying a stationary current 'I'. Participants clarify that the magnetic field 'B' inside the conductor is given by \(\frac{\mu_0Ir}{2\pi a^2}\) for \(ra\). The integral for energy density, \(\iiint_{all\,space} 0.5 B^2 \,dV\), must include contributions from both inside and outside the conductor. The correct approach involves calculating the energy density for a cylindrical shell outside the conductor and determining appropriate limits of integration.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Ampere's Law and magnetic fields
  • Familiarity with energy density concepts in electromagnetism
  • Knowledge of integral calculus for evaluating volume integrals
  • Basic concepts of inductance and its relation to energy
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn how to compute magnetic energy density using \(\frac{\mu_0 I^2}{16 \pi}\)
  • Study the derivation of energy stored in cylindrical shells in electromagnetic fields
  • Explore the relationship between magnetic energy and inductance
  • Investigate the limits of integration for cylindrical coordinates in volume integrals
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in electrical engineering, physicists studying electromagnetism, and anyone interested in the principles of magnetic energy storage in conductors.

Granger
Messages
165
Reaction score
7

Homework Statement


So I came across with following problem:

> Consider a cylindrical conductor of infinite length and circular section of radius a and that is traversed by a stationary current I. What is the magnetic energy stored in the conductor.

Homework Equations


3. The Attempt at a Solution [/B]
So my question is more of a conceptual one.
I proceeded to apply Ampere's law to calculate the B field which is \begin{cases} \frac{\mu_0Ir}{2\pi a^2} \,,\, r<a\\ \\ \\ \frac{\mu_0I}{2\pi r} \,,\, r>a\end{cases}

I checked the resolution of the problem and they seem to only calculate the magnetic energy on the conductor. But according to

$$\iiint_{all\,space} 0.5 B^2 \,dV$$

Shouldn't we take it all space? Because B isn't zero outside of the conductor. I'm so confused on why they just considered the conductor, am i misunderstanding something.

Also let me add that the integral in the cylinder gave us

$$\frac{\mu_0 I^2}{16 \pi}$$

I also have know idea on how to compute the integral outside the conductor. What limits of integration should I take?
I'm really confused, can someone help me?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I believe the formula is E = 0.5 (L * I2). Then you would only need to find the inductance
 
David Lewis said:
I believe the formula is E = 0.5 (L * I2). Then you would only need to find the inductance

The goal of the exercise is to do the opposite e.g. determine E and then use that formula to get L. I didn't post that last bit because it was not relevant for the question I guess.
 
Granger said:
$$\frac{\mu_0 I^2}{16 \pi}$$

I also have know idea on how to compute the integral outside the conductor. What limits of integration should I take?
I'm really confused, can someone help me?
First, I agree with you that the B field outside the conductor must be added to that of the inside. I also agree with the given answer for just the inside mag field.

Do you know how you got the energy (per unit length BTW) for the inside energy? If so, proceed exactly the same way for the outside:
find energy in a cylindrical shell of thickness dr, length l and radius r. Compute the energy density at distance r from the center of the cylinder using the formula for B(r), r > a, which you already have. So differential energy = energy density times differential volume. The it should be obvious what the limits of integration over r have to be.

Keep the length l throughout your computations so you can check dimensions as you go, then at the end you can make l=1.
 
Last edited:
energy density magnetic or electric, both are proportional to square of the module of either B or E

so , that says there's a lot of differents ways to express the energy density of a field , since both use their own distinct constants, e0 and u0 but there is a equivalency you can do by substitution of the energy density which is part of the potential energy of a system equation, and , link that formula , the the induction formula generated by a point in space .

hope this helps, i can post the formulas if you want
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
747
Replies
3
Views
649
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
5K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K