Magnetic Forces on infinite current-carrying wires

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the magnetic forces acting on infinite current-carrying wires, specifically focusing on wires 2 and 5 in a given configuration. Participants are analyzing the forces generated by the magnetic fields produced by other wires in the arrangement.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to apply the right-hand rule to determine the direction of magnetic forces and fields. There is confusion regarding the correct application of the right-hand rule and the angles involved in the cross products for force calculations.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on the correct use of the right-hand rule for determining force directions. There is an ongoing exploration of the relationships between the magnetic fields and the resulting forces, with some participants questioning their interpretations and seeking clarification on the setup.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of confusion regarding the labeling of magnetic fields in diagrams, and participants are encouraged to clarify their visual representations to aid understanding. The problem involves multiple wires and their interactions, which adds complexity to the analysis.

cookiemnstr510510
Messages
162
Reaction score
14

Homework Statement


A) Three infinite, current-carrying wires are arranged as shown below. In terms of the given quantities, determine the magnitude and direction of the magnetic force per length acting upon wire 2. (Part A.jpg attached)
B) Three infinite, current-carrying wires are arranged as shown below in terms of the given quantities, determine the magnitude and direction of the magnetic force per length acting upon wire 5.(Part B.jpg attached)

Homework Equations


B=(μ0I)/(2πd)
F=ILxB

The Attempt at a Solution


A) Both wires 1 and 3 create a magnetic field at the location of wire 2.
Wire 1's magnetic field points straight upward in the j-hat direction.
Wire 3's magnetic field points at a -45° angle from the positive i-hat direction which is from left to right.

Using right hand rule:

F1 on 2 is in the positive i-hat direction
and
F3 on 2 is -45° from the negative i-hat direction
These forces are shown in (forces.jpg)

F1on2=I2LB1i-hat
B1=(μ0I1)/(2πd)
therefore:
F1on2=(I2I1LB1)/(2πd) i-hat

F3 on 2=I2LxB2= here is where I am stuck- when doing the cross product here is the θ the angle between both wires? I guess I am confusing the cross product we do for magnetic field and the one we do for forces..

Any help would be appreciated!
 

Attachments

  • Part A.JPG
    Part A.JPG
    9.9 KB · Views: 346
  • Part B.JPG
    Part B.JPG
    12.9 KB · Views: 346
  • Forces.JPG
    Forces.JPG
    21.7 KB · Views: 351
Physics news on Phys.org
The magnetic force directions you show are incorrect. The magnetic force due to each wire is not along the line joining the wires but perpendicular to it as prescribed by the right hand rule.
 
Hello kuruman!
So I was thinking about the magnetic field as (magneticfield.jpg) (Small error in my picture where it says B2 it should say B3)
From there I did the RHR and obtained my forces.
I guess I am still incorrect?
 

Attachments

  • magneticfield.JPG
    magneticfield.JPG
    12.1 KB · Views: 381
The directions for the magnetic fields are correct as shown in post #3. Now you have to do another right hand rule diagram for the forces.
 
kuruman said:
The directions for the magnetic fields are correct as shown in post #3. Now you have to do another right hand rule diagram for the forces.
Hmm, okay. So for B1 for image in post 3, I point my four fingers in the direction of current of the wire in question (wire with current I2) and curl my fingers up towards B1 which would result in a force directly to the right. Is this correct? or am i confusing RHR's
I can try to draw a picture of what I am representing if that would make it easier to understand.
 
There are many ways to use one's fingers for the right hand rule. Please post a drawing of the two forces acting on the wire and we'll take it from there.
 
I guess I am not seeing how my Forces.jpg image is incorrect in post 1. I realize you said that the forces need to be perpendicular to the line adjoining wires, so does that mean into or out of the page since those are both perpendicular to the lines adjoining them?
 
cookiemnstr510510 said:
I guess I am not seeing how my Forces.jpg image is incorrect in post 1.
Sorry, your forces in that diagram are correct. I got confuse with the mislabeled B2 that should have been a B3. You now need to write F3 in component form and add the two forces.
 
kuruman said:
Sorry, your forces in that diagram are correct. I got confuse with the mislabeled B2 that should have been a B3. You now need to write F3 in component form and add the two forces.
ahh, okay. Yes my images were confusing!

So I am getting the total force acting on wire 2 is:
From here on out F1 on 2= F12
and F3 on 2=F32

Ftotal=F12(i-hat) - F32cos(45°)(i-hat) - F32sin(45°)(j-hat)
 
  • #10
After thinking about a bit more:
F=ILxB
F12=I1LB1sin(90)(i-hat)=I1LB(i-hat)
The question is asking for Force per length so
(F12/L)=I1B1(i-hat)
and
F32=I3LxB3sin(90) (-cos(45)-sin(45)) I am saying sin(90) for the cross product because the angle between current I2 and B32 is 90 degrees... Therefore
F32=-I3LB[3(√2)/2](i-hat) - I3LB3[(√2)/2](j-hat)
(F32/L)=-[(√2)/2]I3B3(i-hat)-[(√2)/2]I3B3(j-hat)

(Ftotal/L)=I1B1(i-hat)-[(√2)/2]I3B3(i-hat)-[(√2)/2]I3B3(j-hat)
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K