Magnetic field due to infinite current carrying wire in the X and Y axes

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the magnetic field due to infinite current-carrying wires positioned along the X and Y axes. Participants are examining the application of the Biot-Savart law and the right-hand grip rule to determine the direction and magnitude of the magnetic fields generated by these wires.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the direction of the magnetic fields produced by the wires, questioning the assumptions made about their orientations. There are attempts to calculate the distances from a point to the axes and the resulting magnetic fields, with some participants suggesting the need for a consistent coordinate system. Others raise concerns about vector addition and the cancellation of components.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights into the calculations and the need to consider vector components. Some guidance has been offered regarding the addition of magnetic fields as vectors in a Cartesian coordinate system, but no consensus has been reached on the final form of the magnetic field.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of homework rules, which may limit the information they can share or the methods they can use. There is also a focus on ensuring that calculations align with the principles of vector addition in physics.

wcjy
Messages
73
Reaction score
10
Homework Statement
Consider 2 identical infinite current-carrying wires which runs along the X and Y axes
respectively. They carry identical currents I and the currents flow in the directions of the
axes. Find the net magnetic field (in vector form) at the coordinate (x, y, z) = (4,4,5).
Relevant Equations
Biot savar law
$$B = \frac {\mu_0 I}{2 \pi r} $$

By Right-hand Grip Rule, the direction of the magnetic field by wire in y-axis is into the paper (z)
while the direction of the magnetic field by wire in X-axis is upwards (+i)

The answer state the Magnetic field is in the (i - y) direction though.

Next calculating the magnitude,
Distance of point to the Y axis is $$\sqrt{4^2 + 4^2} = \sqrt{32}$$
Distance of point to the X axis is $$\sqrt{4^2 + 5^2} = \sqrt{41}$$

Therefore, Magnetic field = $$B = \frac {\mu_0 I}{2 \pi \sqrt{32}} +\frac {\mu_0 I}{2 \pi \sqrt{41}} $$
This will give some weird fraction which is wrong.

Correct answer is $$B = \frac {5\mu_0 I}{82 \pi } (\hat{i} - \hat{j}) $$
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
Oh wait is the Magnetic field from wire in Y axis in the (z and x direction) and b field from wire in x-axis in the ( -z and direction) so when adding those B field, the z cancels out?
 
I think so too , the z-component cancels. To see it clearly you must work with both fields in the same cartesian coordinate system. The popular expression $$\vec{B}=\frac{\mu_0}{2\pi}\frac{I}{r}\hat\phi$$ is in cylindrical coordinate system, not in cartesian.

I think in the OP, you do two mistakes: one mistake is that the distance of the (4,4,5) point to the y-axis is i believe ##\sqrt{4^2+5^2}##. The other mistake is that you can't just add those two B-fields cause each has its own ##\hat\phi## direction (hard to explain this without doing a diagram)...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: wcjy
Ok i think i realized my first mistake.
Ok i just realized this. can help me check if what i said is correct.

I drew a 2d diagram for z and x-axis for the wire (yaxis).
the b field will be pointing in the i and z direction.
z direction is $$B = \frac{\mu_o I}{2 \pi r }sin \theta$$
while the i direction is $$\frac{\mu_o I}{2 \pi r }cos \theta$$
cos theta = 5/ sqrt 41
so $$B = \frac{5\mu_o I}{2 *\sqrt{41}*\sqrt{41}*\pi }$$
$$B = \frac{5\mu_o I}{82 \pi } (\hat{i})$$

for the other wire is the same.
but $$B = \frac{5\mu_o I}{82 \pi } (\hat{j})$$

But arent I suppose to add or do the sqrt( B^2 + B^2 ) thing?
 
Yes you are supposed to add them but add them as vectors of a cartesian coordinate system, since the answer given is a vector in a cartesian coordinate system (it contains the unit vectors ##\hat i,\hat j##).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: wcjy
I think you calculated correctly the i-component of the B-field from the wire in y-axis, so the result in vector form would be ##\vec{B_{y wire}}=\frac{5\mu_0 I}{82\pi}\hat i+...\hat k## but we are missing the z or ##\hat k##-component.

Then write a similar expression for the B-field from the wire in x-axis. Then just add them as vectors.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: wcjy
to 'add' them, isn't it $$\sqrt {2 (\frac{5\mu_o I}{82 \pi })^2}$$
 
Delta2 said:
I think you calculated correctly the i-component of the B-field from the wire in y-axis, so the result in vector form would be ##\vec{B_{y wire}}=\frac{5\mu_0 I}{82\pi}\hat i+...\hat k## but we are missing the z or ##\hat k##-component.

Then write a similar expression for the B-field from the wire in x-axis. Then just add them as vectors.
for the k direction, its just sin theta. but it cancels out with the other wire. so i left it out
 
wcjy said:
to 'add' them, isn't it $$\sqrt {2 (\frac{5\mu_o I}{82 \pi })^2}$$
That's the magnitude of the total vector. You are being asked for the vector of total magnetic field (if i judge from the given answer) and not for the magnitude of this vector.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: wcjy
  • #10
oh so if it is
$$\frac{5\mu_o I}{82 \pi } (\hat{i})$$ and $$\frac{5\mu_o I}{82 \pi } (-\hat{j})$$,
the answer is $$ \frac{5\mu_o I}{82 \pi } (\hat{i}-\hat{j})$$ ??
 
  • #11
yes that's what you get if you add the first two as we do in vector addition.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: wcjy
  • #12
Okay. Thanks so much!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K