Magnetospheric eternally collapsing objects

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter tovisonnenberg
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    black holes
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the theory of Magnetospheric Eternally Collapsing Objects (MECOs), which posits that collapsing massive stars do not form singularities but instead reach a state of "eternal collapse" due to radiation pressure approaching the Eddington limit. Participants question the stability of MECOs and the implications of radiation escaping from these objects, particularly in relation to supermassive black holes and their Schwarzschild Radius. The conversation highlights the need for a deeper mathematical understanding of the theory to evaluate its validity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Eddington limit in astrophysics
  • Familiarity with the concept of radiation pressure
  • Knowledge of black hole physics, specifically the Schwarzschild Radius
  • Basic comprehension of theoretical astrophysics and gravitational collapse
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mathematical framework behind Magnetospheric Eternally Collapsing Objects (MECOs)
  • Study the implications of radiation pressure on black hole formation
  • Examine the differences between MECOs and traditional black holes
  • Explore the Eddington limit and its role in stellar evolution
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, astrophysicists, and students of theoretical physics interested in advanced concepts of stellar collapse and black hole formation.

tovisonnenberg
Messages
19
Reaction score
1
I read about a theory (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetospheric_eternally_collapsing_object) (https://arxiv.org/pdf/astro-ph/0602453.pdf) that proposes that collapsing massive stars never actually form a singularity, and instead they end up as "magnetospheric eternally collapsing objects" (MECOs). The theory states that as the infalling matter from a collapsing massive star grows denser and hotter, there will be enough radiation for the object to approach the Eddington limit and halt the collapse. The object is then said to be in "eternal collapse".
My question is:
How can this object maintain its stability for eternity? Why wouldn't the object eventually radiate itself away? At least some radiation from the object must escape because the theory explicitly states that MECOs do not form event horizons.
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
hi there :smile:

tovisonnenberg said:
I read about a theory
where ?
Please don't say something like that without links, quotes etc, so that it can be evaluated by those you would like to read and comment on your post :smile:
We don't know if you were reading a valid scientific paper or some poorly written, for the masses, pop-science article ?regards
Dave
 
I added 2 links in the original post. Thanks for letting me know!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn
The Wiki article seems to claim that the mass would indeed radiate away.

I’m afraid I don’t see how radiation pressure prevents an event horizon from forming, especially in the case of supermassive black holes. The Schwarzschild Radius for these is, in some cases, greater than the diameter of our Solar system. Radiation pressure in this case would have to keep multiple individual stars outside of that radius.

I have not, however, examined the mathematical treatment presented, so maybe I will have a better understanding later.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K