Magnitude of current passing through unit area in atmosphere(He2+ and O2-)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the magnitude and direction of the net current passing through a unit area in the Earth's atmosphere, specifically considering He2+ and O2- ions with given concentrations and velocities.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the definition of current and its relation to charge and time. There are attempts to apply formulas related to current, with some confusion about the correct interpretation of charge density and its relation to velocity.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, questioning assumptions about current direction and charge density. Some guidance has been offered regarding the physical interpretation of charge per unit area and the need to consider the velocities of the ions separately.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of an upcoming junior olympiad, indicating time constraints and pressure on participants to understand the concepts quickly. Participants express uncertainty about the relationships between charge, velocity, and current.

dawn_pingpong
Messages
47
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



At a high point in the Earth’s atmosphere, He2+ ions in a concentration of 2.8 x 10^12 m^-3 are moving due north at a speed of 2.0x10^6 m/s. Also, a 7.0 x 10^11m^-3 concentration of (O2)- (dioxygen -)ions is moving due south at a speed of 7.2 x 10^6m/s. Determine the magnitude and direction of the net current passing through unit area.


Homework Equations


I have no idea how to even approach this question... I think there is some law or sth that I don't know.


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
What do you think "current" is?
 
voko said:
What do you think "current" is?

I=Qt (or V/R which is not very useful here...)

But I don't know how to apply the formula/other formulas. The answer is in terms of A/m2, so it is electric current.
 
dawn_pingpong said:
I=Qt

Is it Qt or Q/t?
 
Sorry sorry my bad:( it's charge per unit time...
 
Urgh I have this junior olympiad tomorrow really last minute cramping of formulas:(
 
Q/t it is. Now, what do you think the direction of the net current is?
 
I think, it is moving to the north. the He has a higher concentration, and furthermore it's 2+. then Q of He per unit area is 1.6x10^-19 x 2 x 2.8 x 10^12=8.96 x 10^-7C
Similarly QO2=-1.12 x 10^-7C

Then how does speed and time come into play? Or... is it like add both together, and find the net (positive charge?) which will be 7.84x10^-7C

or is there something to do with KE=1/2 MV^2=pd X Q? I think can find m, v just take as velocity of helium, then find pd. (though I think this is going no where).

What is the relationship with time then?
 
dawn_pingpong said:
I think, it is moving to the north. the He has a higher concentration, and furthermore it's 2+.

Correct, the currents of oppositely charged particles flow in opposite directions, thus the net current flows where the positive particles flow.

then Q of He per unit area is 1.6x10^-19 x 2 x 2.8 x 10^12=8.96 x 10^-7C

Why is this "per unit area"? It is not. This is simply the concentration of charge per unit volume (cubic meter).

Similarly QO2=-1.12 x 10^-7C

Same remark. Plus, think about the sign in connection to what you just figured out with regard to direction.

Then how does speed and time come into play?

You have something that you know concentration of per unit volume. You know its speed. You need something per unit area per second. Think about the dimensions and then think whether you can give a plausible physical interpretation to the result of your thinking.
 
  • #10
voko said:
Correct, the currents of oppositely charged particles flow in opposite directions, thus the net current flows where the positive particles flow.



Why is this "per unit area"? It is not. This is simply the concentration of charge per unit volume (cubic meter).



Same remark. Plus, think about the sign in connection to what you just figured out with regard to direction.



You have something that you know concentration of per unit volume. You know its speed. You need something per unit area per second. Think about the dimensions and then think whether you can give a plausible physical interpretation to the result of your thinking.

is it just Qv? (1/m^3 x m/s = 1/m^2s) then it's 7.84x10^-7 x 2.0 x 10^6 = 1.57A/m^2. But this is wrong. I have a feeling I missed out something else. (anyway it's not the correct answer...) the unit is correct though. So i suppose is manupilation of some of the numbers. ahh you are so deep...

okay I think it's the separate speed. So don't take the net charge, rather Q x v(He) + QV(O2). I think it's addition because like one is negative and other one is positive, and it is not counter productive (which I believed at first) And adding together gives 2.6C/M^2s= 2.6A/m^2 which is the Answer:D

I think I'm just manupilating the numbers to get the desired answer, and don't understand the true concepts... Searched online and found it's actually charge density. But I still don't get why it is related to velocity...

Thank you:D:-p
 
  • #11
dawn_pingpong said:
is it just Qv? (1/m^3 x m/s = 1/m^2s) then it's 7.84x10^-7 x 2.0 x 10^6 = 1.57A/m^2. But this is wrong. I have a feeling I missed out something else. (anyway it's not the correct answer...) the unit is correct though. So i suppose is manupilation of some of the numbers. ahh you are so deep...

That's why I said you should try and interpret that physically. Q is charge density, i.e., charge divided by volume. You need to find the total charge passing per area per time. So you need to find some volume to multiply that charge with, then divide by area and time. That volume, physically, must contain all the charge that passes through the area during the time. What volume is that?

okay I think it's the separate speed. So don't take the net charge, rather Q x v(He) + QV(O2). I think it's addition because like one is negative and other one is positive, and it is not counter productive

Exactly.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K