Magnitude of magnetic field at different points near a capacitor.

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the magnitude of the magnetic field at various points near a capacitor, utilizing the Ampere-Maxwell law. Participants are examining the relationships between magnetic fields and electric fields in the context of a capacitor's operation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of the Ampere-Maxwell law and the use of circular Amperian loops to derive expressions for the magnetic field at different points. Questions arise regarding the inclusion of the permittivity constant, ##\epsilon_0##, in the calculations, and whether the equations are set up correctly.

Discussion Status

There is ongoing clarification regarding the correct application of the Ampere-Maxwell law, with some participants pointing out potential errors in the original equations. Several participants acknowledge the need to include a factor of ##\epsilon_0## and discuss the implications of this on the derived expressions. The conversation reflects a collaborative effort to refine the understanding of the problem without reaching a definitive conclusion.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of homework rules, which may limit the amount of direct assistance provided. The discussion highlights the importance of accurately applying fundamental laws in electromagnetism and the potential for misinterpretation in complex equations.

zenterix
Messages
774
Reaction score
84
Homework Statement
Consider a capacitor that is charging, as in the picture below. The capacitor is ideal (no edge effects).

Points ##a## and ##b## areat a distance ##r_1>R## with respect to the center line, and ##c## and ##d## are at a distance ##r_2<R##.
Relevant Equations
Which of the following statements about ##B##, the magnitude of the magnetic field, at points ##a,b,c,## and ##d## are true?

##B(a)>B(b)##
##B(a)<B(b)##
##B(a)=B(b)##

##B(c)>B(d)##
##B(c)<B(d)##
##B(c)=B(d)##
Here is a picture depicting the capacitor and the points of interest.
1715970833063.png

I approached this problem by applying the Ampere-Maxwell law.

For each point I used an circular Amperian loop that I denote by ##P##, enclosing a circular surface ##S##.

Thus, for point ##b## we have

$$\oint_{P_b}\vec{B}\cdot d\vec{s}=B_b2\pi r_1=\mu_0 I\implies B_b=\frac{\mu_0 I}{2\pi r_1}$$

Similarly, for point ##d##

$$B_d=\frac{\mu_0 I}{2\pi r_2}$$

Next, I considered points ##a## and ##c##.

The magnitude of the electric field between the plates is ##\frac{q}{\epsilon_0 A}## where ##A## is the area of a capacitor plate.

$$\oint_{P_a}\vec{B}\cdot d\vec{s}=B_a2\pi r_1=\mu_0\frac{d}{dt}\left (\frac{q}{\epsilon_0 A}\right )\pi R^2$$

$$=\frac{\mu_0 I\pi R^2}{\epsilon_0\pi R^2}$$

$$\implies B_a=\frac{\mu_0I}{\epsilon_0 2\pi r_1}$$

Similarly

$$B_c2\pi r_2=\mu_0\frac{d}{dt}\left (\frac{q}{\epsilon_0 A}\right )\pi r_2^2=\frac{\mu_0 I\pi r_2^2}{\epsilon_0\pi R^2}$$

$$=\frac{\mu_0 Ir_2^2}{\epsilon_0 R^2}$$

$$B_c=\frac{\mu_0 I r_2}{\epsilon_0 2\pi R^2}$$

These are my calculations currently. They seem incorrect. Having a ##\epsilon_0## factor in the denominator of these expressions seems incorrect at first glance given that the order of magnitude of this constant is ##10^{-12}##.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
zenterix said:
The magnitude of the electric field between the plates is ##\frac{q}{\epsilon_0 A}## where ##A## is the area of a capacitor plate.

$$\oint_{P_a}\vec{B}\cdot d\vec{s}=B_a2\pi r_1=\mu_0\frac{d}{dt}\left (\frac{q}{\epsilon_0 A}\right )\pi R^2$$
What is the fundamental law that you are using to set up this equation? You might be missing a factor of ##\epsilon_0##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: zenterix
If you are going to quote the Ampere-Maxwell law, quote it correctly. The displacement current term (Maxwell's correction) is ##\mathbf J_d=\dfrac{\partial \mathbf D}{\partial t}=\dfrac{\partial (\epsilon_0 \mathbf E)}{\partial t}##. The ##\epsilon_0## in the numerator cancels the one in the denominator.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: zenterix
TSny said:
You might be missing a factor of ϵ0.
Indeed you are correct. I forgot a factor of ##\epsilon_0##.

$$\oint \vec{B}\cdot d\vec{s}=\mu_0\left (\iint_S \vec{J}\cdot\hat{n}dA+\epsilon_0\iint_S \vec{E}\hat{n}dA\right )$$
 
zenterix said:
Indeed you are correct. I forgot a factor of ##\epsilon_0##.

$$\oint \vec{B}\cdot d\vec{s}=\mu_0\left (\iint_S \vec{J}\cdot\hat{n}dA+\epsilon_0\iint_S \vec{E}\hat{n}dA\right )$$
OK, but here you forgot a time derivative.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: zenterix
Indeed

$$\oint \vec{B}\cdot d\vec{s}=\mu_0\left (\iint_S \vec{J}\cdot\hat{n}dA+\epsilon_0\frac{d}{dt}\iint_S \vec{E}\hat{n}dA\right )$$

Fixing the original equations we have

$$B_a=B_b=\frac{\mu_0I}{2\pi r_1}$$

$$B_c=\frac{\mu_0I}{2\pi r_2}\frac{r_2^2}{R^2}$$

$$B_d=\frac{\mu_0I}{2\pi r_2}$$

Thus, ##B_a=B_b## and ##B_c<B_d##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: TSny
zenterix said:
Indeed
$$\oint \vec{B}\cdot d\vec{s}=\mu_0\left (\iint_S \vec{J}\cdot\hat{n}dA+\epsilon_0\frac{d}{dt}\iint_S \vec{E}\hat{n}dA\right )$$
Fixing the original equations we have

$$B_a=B_b=\frac{\mu_0I}{2\pi r_1}$$
$$B_c=\frac{\mu_0I}{2\pi r_2}\frac{r_2^2}{R^2}$$
$$B_d=\frac{\mu_0I}{2\pi r_2}$$
Thus, ##B_a=B_b## and ##B_c<B_d##.
Looks good to me.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K