Magnitude of radial component of jerk along line of centres

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The magnitude of the radial component of jerk along the line of centres between two gravitating bodies is defined as 2G(m1+m2)r(dot)/r3. This conclusion is derived from the acceleration equation r(double dot) = -G(m1+m2)r(hat)/r2, which is then modified to account for both bodies, resulting in r(double dot) = 2G(m1+m2)r(hat)/r2. The final expression for jerk, r(triple dot) = 2G(m1+m2)r(dot)/r3, is confirmed as correct, although the scalar r in the denominator is indeed a function of time.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's law of gravitation
  • Familiarity with vector calculus and unit vectors
  • Knowledge of derivatives and their physical interpretations
  • Basic concepts of motion in classical mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of gravitational acceleration in classical mechanics
  • Learn about the implications of jerk in physics and its applications
  • Explore the relationship between position, velocity, acceleration, and jerk
  • Investigate the effects of time-dependent variables in gravitational systems
USEFUL FOR

Students studying classical mechanics, physicists analyzing gravitational interactions, and anyone interested in the mathematical modeling of motion between celestial bodies.

tim_from_oz
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Show that the component of the jerk along the line of centres of two gravitating bodies has magnitude 2G(m1+m2)r(dot)/r3.

Homework Equations



(Eq. 1) r(double dot) = - G(m1+m2)r(hat)/r2 (acceleration of body 2 relative to body 1)

The Attempt at a Solution



Sorry for the (dots) and (hats), not sure how to put them on here.

Since I am only after the magnitude of the jerk radially between the two masses, and for each body this is equal to or opposite to Eq. 1, they can essentially be added, giving:

(Eq. 2) r(double dot) = 2G(m1+m2)r(hat)/r2

r(hat) is the unit vector, so this can be broken down into r(vector)/|r|, thus giving:

(Eq. 3) r(double dot) = 2G(m1+m2)r(vector)/r3

Finally, taking the derivative of the acceleration to get the jerk gives:

(Eq. 4) r(triple dot) = 2G(m1+m2)r(dot)/r3

This seems to have been too simple for me, so I think I've probably made some incorrect assumptions. I'm just looking for some guidance on whether I went down the right track or whether I should be heading down a different one.

This is an assessed problem, so just some guidance in the right direction would be appreciated as opposed to full solutions, etc.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
tim_from_oz said:
Finally, taking the derivative of the acceleration to get the jerk gives:

(Eq. 4) r(triple dot) = 2G(m1+m2)r(dot)/r3
Is the scalar r in the denominator not also a function of time?
(I feel that replacing the ##\hat r## with ##\frac{\vec r}{r}## was not helpful.)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
12K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
31
Views
2K