Make an operator to be hermitian

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter masoodsa
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hermitian Operator
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on transforming a non-Hermitian operator into a Hermitian one by adding its Hermitian conjugate and redefining it. It establishes that any operator can be expressed in the form H = A + iB, where both A and B are Hermitian. The necessity of Hermitian operators is linked to the properties of continuous transformations and symmetry, as outlined by Wigner's Theorem. The discussion emphasizes that the imaginary component of the operator must be handled carefully to maintain the physical interpretation of observations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hermitian operators in quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with the Born Rule and its implications
  • Knowledge of Wigner's Theorem and its relevance to unitary transformations
  • Basic concepts of operator algebra in quantum mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Born Rule in quantum mechanics
  • Explore Wigner's Theorem and its applications in quantum theory
  • Learn about the properties and significance of Hermitian operators
  • Investigate the implications of continuous transformations in quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, researchers in theoretical physics, and students studying quantum mechanics who are interested in operator theory and the foundations of quantum measurement.

masoodsa
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I have an operator which isnot Hermitian is there any way to make it hermitian ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
add its hermitian conjugate and redefine it.
 
Any operator can be written of the form H = A + iB where A and B are Hermitian.

In fact one could base QM on any operator using that result via the obvious extension to the Born Rule E(H) = E(A) + i E(B)

Interestingly in proving the Born rule via Gleason that's what one does.

So why does one stick with Hermitan operators? The reason is the properties of continuous transformations between states and symmetry. Wigners Theroem implies such must be Unitary:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wigner's_theorem

If U is such a transformation dependent on t (not necessarily time) and we consider Δt small. U(Δt) = 1 + D Δt. UU(bar) = 1 + DΔt + D(bar)Δt = 1 or D = -D(bar) which means D is pure imaginary. If we want to associate D with an observation, which from symmetry considerations you want to do because it leads to the same equations as classical physics (see Ballentine chapter 3), then its expectation would be imaginary as well which would be a rather strange thing. So what we do is define divide D by i and use that operator which is of course real.

Thanks
Bill
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K