MHB Make x the subject of 2x/5-3b/4=x+5

  • Thread starter Thread starter blackfriars
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To rearrange the equation 2x/5 - 3b/4 = x + 5 and make x the subject, the fractions can be eliminated by multiplying both sides by 20, the least common multiple of the denominators. This results in the equation 8x - 15b = 20x + 100. Rearranging gives -15b - 100 = 12x, which simplifies to x = -(15b + 100)/12. The discussion highlights the importance of properly handling terms when moving them across the equation, as mistakes can lead to incorrect conclusions about the value of x. Understanding these steps is crucial for solving similar algebraic equations effectively.
blackfriars
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
hi to all
looking for some help to rearrange a formula to make x the subject
2x/5-3b/4=x+5

i moved +5 to the left and it became -5
i thought the negative 5 would cancel the denominator 5

this is what i thought i could do

2x-3b/4=x

-2x -2x

-3b/4 =-x
multiply both sides by -1 and the result i thought should be

3b/4=x
thanks in adv
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Are you a student attending math classes?
 
Yes i am
 
$$\frac{2x}{5} - \frac{3b}{4}=x+5$$

To clear fractions, multiply both sides of the equation by $20$, the $\text{lcm}$ of $5$ and $4$:

$$8x-15b=20x+100$$

Rearrange so $x$ is on its own on one side of the equation:

$$-15b-100=20x-8x$$

Simplify:

$$-15b-100=12x$$

Divide through by $12$:

$$x=-\frac{15b+100}{12}$$
 
Thanks for that all i can do is learn
Cheers
 
blackfriars said:
i moved +5 to the left and it became -5
i thought the negative 5 would cancel the denominator 5
Make up a simple case:
x/5 = 5 : evident that x = 25, right?
Now, move the 5 as you did:
x/5 - 5 = 0 : ok?
Cancel the denominator with the -5:
x = 0
BUT x = 25 : convinced?
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top